Skip to search boxSkip to navigationSkip to main content

Effect of repeated screw joint closing and opening cycles on implant prosthetic screw reverse torque and implant and screw thread morphology

  • Keith L. Guzaitis
    ,
  • Kent L. Knoernschild(corresponding author)
    ,
  • Marlos A.G. Viana
*Corresponding author for this work
  • University of Illinois at Chicago
    ,
  • Private Practice
Scholary Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Abstract

Statement of problem. Clinicians must know if a new screw can predictably increase reverse torque after multiple screw insertion cycles. Purpose. The purpose of this study was (1) to compare the effect of multiple implant prosthetic screw insertion and removal cycles on reverse torque, (2) to determine whether a new screw, after multiple screw insertion cycles, affects reverse torque, and (3) to assess implant and prosthetic screw thread surface morphology with scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Material and methods. One primary screw was paired with an implant (MT Osseospeed) and inserted to 25 Ncm torque 9, 19, 29, or 39 times (n=10). Primary screw reverse torque values were recorded after each insertion. A second, reference screw was then paired with each implant for a final screw insertion, and reverse torque was measured. Maximum, minimum, median, and mean values (P max, P min, P median, and P mean) were identified for primary screws. A 1-way ANOVA and Tukey HSD post hoc analysis assessed the influence of multiple screw insertion cycles on P max, P min, P median, and P mean values (α=.05). Confidence intervals were used to test differences between reference (REF) screw data and corresponding DMAX and DMIN (DMAX=P max-REF; DMIN=P min-REF). The surface topography of an unused implant and screw and of 1 implant and screw from each group was evaluated with SEM. Results. Pairwise comparisons showed that 9 or fewer insertion cycles resulted in significantly greater mean reverse torque (20.9 ± 0.5 Ncm; P<.01). After 19, 29, or 39 cycles, the second, reference screw achieved significantly greater reverse torque than the minimum recorded values (P<.05). Implant thread surface morphology changes occurred primarily during the first 10 insertions. Conclusions. After 10 screw insertion cycles, a new prosthetic screw should be used with the implant system tested to maximize screw reverse torque and maintain preload when an abutment is definitively placed.

Publication Information

Output type

Scholary Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Original language

English (US)

Pages from-to (Number of pages)

Pages 159-169 (11 pages)

Journal (Volume, Issue Number)

Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry (Volume 106, Issue 3)

Publication milestones

  • Published - 09/2011

Publication status

Published - 09/2011

ISSN

0022-3913

Publication IDs

  • Scopus: 80052343977
  • PubMed: 21889002

Publication metrics

Metrics

Fractional count
1
Fractional count
0.33
Fractional count
2
Fractional count
0.67
Fractional count
1
Fractional count
1
SciVal
citations
29
Scopus
citations
SciVal
FWCI
1.07
SciVal
Author count
3
SciVal
Paper percentile
84

PlumX, opens in new tab

Captures
111
Citation count
61

Funding Details

Supported by an American Academy of Fixed Prosthodontics Tylman Research Grant. First Place, 2008 Stanley D. Tylman Research Award.
FunderFunding numbers
AAFP
-