Skip to search boxSkip to navigationSkip to main content

Effect of rubbing force magnitude on bond strength of universal adhesives applied in self-etch mode

  • Özgür Irmak(corresponding author)
    ,
  • Batu Can Yaman
    ,
  • Ekim Onur Orhan
    ,
  • Fusun Ozer
    ,
  • Markus B. Blatz
*Corresponding author for this work
  • Osmangazi University
    ,
  • University of Pennsylvania
Scholary Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Open access

Abstract

This study investigated the effect of rubbing force magnitude on dentin bond strengths of multi-mode adhesives applied in self-etch mode. Seventy-two extracted human molar teeth were used. Two different universal adhesives Single Bond Universal (SB) and Clearfil Universal (CL) were applied onto dentin surfaces in three different modes: without rubbing (NR), rubbing with 40 gf (gram-force) (40) or 80 gf (80) load. Teeth were restored with a resin composite. Half of the specimens were subject to thermal aging (10,000 cycles). Microtensile bond strength was measured and data were statistically analyzed with two-way analysis of variance and Tukey’s test (α=0.05). Baseline bond strength values for CL adhesive were improved by rubbing (40 and 80 gf) as compared to no rubbing (p<0.05). Rubbing did not significantly improve bond strength values for SB, regardless of aging (p>0.05). Rubbing improves bonding performance of some universal adhesives to dentin when applied in self-etch mode.

Publication Information

Output type

Scholary Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Original language

English (US)

Pages from-to (Number of pages)

Pages 139-145 (7 pages)

Journal (Volume, Issue Number)

Dental Materials Journal (Volume 37, Issue 1)

Publication milestones

  • Published - 2018

Publication status

Published - 2018

ISSN

0287-4547

Publication IDs

  • Scopus: 85041301980

Publication metrics

Metrics

SciVal
FWCI
1.00
SciVal
Author count
5
SciVal
citations
7
SciVal
Paper percentile
74
Fractional count
1
Fractional count
0.20
Fractional count
4
Fractional count
0.80
Fractional count
1
Fractional count
1
Scopus
citations

PlumX, opens in new tab

Captures
46
Citation count
26