Skip to search boxSkip to navigationSkip to main content

Effects of screening for psychological distress on patient outcomes in cancer: A systematic review

  • Anna Meijer
    ,
  • Michelle Roseman
    ,
  • Vanessa C. Delisle
    ,
  • Katherine Milette
    ,
  • Brooke Levis
    ,
  • Achyuth Syamchandra
*Corresponding author for this work
  • University of Groningen
    ,
  • McGill University
    ,
  • Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research
    ,
  • Indiana University Bloomington
    ,
  • University of Toronto
    ,
  • University Health Network
Scholary Output:
Contribution to journal
Review article
Peer-review

Open access

Sustainable Development Goals

  • SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well

Abstract

Objective: Several practice guidelines recommend routine screening for psychological distress in cancer care. The objective was to evaluate the effect of screening cancer patients for psychological distress by assessing the (1) effectiveness of interventions to reduce distress among patients identified as distressed; and (2) effects of screening for distress on distress outcomes. Methods: CINAHL, Cochrane, EMBASE, ISI, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, and SCOPUS databases were searched through April 6, 2011 with manual searches of 45 relevant journals, reference list review, citation tracking of included articles, and trial registry reviews through June 30, 2012. Articles in any language on cancer patients were included if they (1) compared treatment for patients with psychological distress to placebo or usual care in a randomized controlled trial (RCT); or (2) assessed the effect of screening on psychological distress in a RCT. Results: There were 14 eligible RCTs for treatment of distress, and 1 RCT on the effects of screening on patient distress. Pharmacological, psychotherapy and collaborative care interventions generally reduced distress with small to moderate effects. One study investigated effects of screening for distress on psychological outcomes, and it found no improvement. Conclusion: Treatment studies reported modest improvement in distress symptoms, but only a single eligible study was found on the effects of screening cancer patients for distress, and distress did not improve in screened patients versus those receiving usual care. Because of the lack of evidence of beneficial effects of screening cancer patients for distress, it is premature to recommend or mandate implementation of routine screening.

Publication Information

Output type

Scholary Output:
Contribution to journal
Review article
Peer-review

Original language

English (US)

Pages from-to (Number of pages)

Pages 1-17 (17 pages)

Journal (Volume, Issue Number)

Journal of Psychosomatic Research (Volume 75, Issue 1)

Publication milestones

  • Published - 07/2013

Publication status

Published - 07/2013

ISSN

0022-3999

Publication IDs

  • Scopus: 84878956371
  • PubMed: 23751231

Publication metrics

Metrics

SciVal
FWCI
2.03
SciVal
Author count
11
SciVal
citations
74
SciVal
Paper percentile
96
SciVal
Top percentile
5
Scopus
citations
Fractional count
1
Fractional count
0.09
Fractional count
10
Fractional count
0.91
Fractional count
1
Fractional count
1

PlumX, opens in new tab

Citation count
123
Captures
189