Skip to search boxSkip to navigationSkip to main content

Efficacy of the enamel matrix derivative in direct pulp capping procedures: A systematic review

  • Khalid Al-Hezaimi(corresponding author)
    ,
  • Fawad Javed
    ,
  • Khalid Al-Fouzan
    ,
*Corresponding author for this work
  • King Saud University
    ,
  • Ministry of National Guard – Health Affairs
    ,
Scholary Output:
Contribution to journal
Review article
Peer-review

Abstract

The aim was to review the efficacy of the enamel matrix derivative (EMD) in direct pulp capping (DPC) procedures. Databases were explored using the following keywords: 'dental', 'dentine', 'enamel matrix derivative', 'pulp capping' and 'treatment'. The inclusion criteria were: (i) original studies; (ii) human and animal studies; (iii) reference list of potentially relevant original and review articles; (iv) intervention: effect of EMD on pulp-capping procedures; and (v) articles published only in English. Eight studies (four human and four animal) were included. Among the human studies, two studies reported that EMD is a more efficient DPC procedure compared with calcium hydroxide (Ca(OH)2). One study reported Ca(OH)2 to be more efficient for DPC than EMD. One study reported no difference in the efficacies between EMD and Ca(OH)2 for DPC. All animal studies reported EMD to be more effective in reparative dentine formation in comparison with Ca(OH)2. EMD can provide favourable results in DPC procedures.

Publication Information

Output type

Scholary Output:
Contribution to journal
Review article
Peer-review

Original language

English (US)

Pages from-to (Number of pages)

Pages 171-175 (5 pages)

Journal (Volume, Issue Number)

Australian Endodontic Journal (Volume 39, Issue 3)

Publication milestones

  • Published - 12/2013

Publication status

Published - 12/2013

ISSN

1329-1947

Publication IDs

  • Scopus: 84888311103
  • PubMed: 24279667

Publication metrics

Metrics

Scopus
citations
SciVal
FWCI
0.60
SciVal
Author count
4
SciVal
citations
10
SciVal
Paper percentile
66
Fractional count
1
Fractional count
0.25
Fractional count
3
Fractional count
0.75
Fractional count
1
Fractional count
1

PlumX, opens in new tab

Captures
64
Citation count
13
Social media
1