Skip to search boxSkip to navigationSkip to main content

Electromyographic recordings of low back pain subjects and non-pain controls in six different positions: effect of pain levels

  • John G. Arena(corresponding author)
    ,
  • Richard A. Sherman
    ,
  • Glenda M. Bruno
    ,
  • Timothy R. Young
*Corresponding author for this work
  • VA Medical Center
    ,
  • Fitzsimons Army Medical Center
Scholary Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Abstract

Surface electromyographic (EMG) activity recordings of bilateral paraspinal muscle tension were measured twice on 20 non-pain controls and on 46 low back pain subjects (21 individuals with intervertebral disk disorders and 25 subjects with unspecified musculoskeletal backache) during 6 positions: standing, bending from the waist, rising, sitting with back unsupported, sitting with back supported, and prone. Back pain subjects were measured during both low pain and high pain states. Results revealed a non-significant trend for all subjects, regardless of diagnosis, to have higher paraspinal muscle tension levels on the second (or high pain) assessment. A significant diagnosis by position interaction was observed which was similar to the interaction in our previous study which employed only a single measurement session. Analysis of simple main effects revealed this to be due to control subjects during the standing position having lower EMG levels than the back pain groups, and intervertebral disk disorder subjects having higher EMG levels than the other groups during the supported sitting position. As in our previous study, diagnosis was found to be a clinically significant factor, in that controls had much fewer clinically abnormal readings than back pain patients. The lack of a significant effect for pain state is congruent with findings in the headache literature. The importance of clearly defined diagnostic categories in low back pain research and the utility of measuring subjects in various positions is discussed, as are possible explanations for lack of significant pain state findings.

Publication Information

Output type

Scholary Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Original language

English (US)

Pages from-to (Number of pages)

Pages 23-28 (6 pages)

Journal (Volume, Issue Number)

Pain (Volume 45, Issue 1)

Publication milestones

  • Published - 04/1991

Publication status

Published - 04/1991

ISSN

0304-3959

Publication IDs

  • Scopus: 0025756298
  • PubMed: 1830645

Publication metrics

Metrics

Fractional count
1
Fractional count
0.25
Fractional count
3
Fractional count
0.75
Fractional count
1
Fractional count
1
Scopus
citations

PlumX, opens in new tab

Social media
6
Captures
51
Citation count
68

Funding Details

The opinions or assertions contained herein are the private views of the authors and are not to be construed as official or as reflecting the views of the United States Departments of the Army, Defense or Veterans Affairs. This study was supported by Rehabilitation Research Service of the United States Department of Veterans Affairs and by the United States Army.
FundersFunding numbers
Rehabilitation Research Service of the United States Department of Veterans Affairs
-
U.S. Army Dental Activity and U.S. Army Institute of Dental Research, Walter Reed Army Medical Center
-