Skip to search boxSkip to navigationSkip to main content

Electrophysiological evaluation of the Modified Tardieu Scale (MTS) in assessing poststroke wrist flexor spasticity

  • Soofia Naghdi(corresponding author)
    ,
  • Noureddin Nakhostin Ansari
    ,
  • Hamid Abolhasani
    ,
  • Korosh Mansouri
    ,
  • Nastaran Ghotbi
    ,
  • Scott Hasson
*Corresponding author for this work
  • Tehran University of Medical Sciences
    ,
  • Iran University of Medical Sciences
    ,
Scholary Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Spasticity is a common impairment following upper motor neuron lesions such as stroke. The appropriate measurement of muscle spasticity using validated tools to evaluate the outcome of therapies is important in clinical and research settings. OBJECTIVE: To determine the concurrent criterion-related validity of the Modified Tardieu Scale (MTS) in assessing poststroke wrist flexor muscle spasticity based on its correlation with H-reflex tests. METHODS: A total of 20 adult patients poststroke underwent clinical and electrophysiological assessment of wrist flexor muscle spasticity on the affected side. The primary outcome measures were: R2-R1 of the MTS; and the H-reflex indices of Hmax/Mmax ratio and H slp/Mslp ratio. The Hslp and the latency of H-reflex were also measured. RESULTS: Correlations tests did not reveal significant associations between the clinical and H-reflex tests. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that the MTS may not be a valid tool to evaluate muscle spasticity in this sample of patients after stroke.

Publication Information

Output type

Scholary Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Original language

English (US)

Pages from-to (Number of pages)

Pages 177-184 (8 pages)

Journal (Volume, Issue Number)

NeuroRehabilitation (Volume 34, Issue 1)

Publication milestones

  • Published - 2014

Publication status

Published - 2014

ISSN

1053-8135

Publication IDs

  • Scopus: 84894134538
  • PubMed: 24284462

Publication metrics

Metrics

SciVal
citations
16
Fractional count
1
Fractional count
0.17
Fractional count
5
Fractional count
0.83
Fractional count
1
Fractional count
1
Scopus
citations
SciVal
FWCI
1.03
SciVal
Author count
6
SciVal
Paper percentile
77

PlumX, opens in new tab

Citation count
26
Captures
79