Skip to search boxSkip to navigationSkip to main content

Equivalence of paper-and-pencil and online administration modes of the statewide English test for students with and without disabilities

  • Do Hong Kim(corresponding author)
    ,
  • Huynh Huynh
*Corresponding author for this work
  • University of North Carolina at Charlotte
    ,
  • University of South Carolina
Scholary Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Research
Peer-review

Abstract

This study investigated whether scores obtained from the online and paper-and-pencil administrations of the statewide end-of-course English test were equivalent for students with and without disabilities. Score comparability was evaluated by examining equivalence of factor structure (mea-surement invariance) and differential item and bundle functioning analyses for the online and paper groups. Results supported measurement invariance between the online and paper groups, suggesting that it is meaningful to compare scores across administration modes. When the data were analyzed at both the item and item bundle (content area) levels, similar performance appeared between the online and paper groups.

Publication Information

Output type

Scholary Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Research
Peer-review

Original language

English (US)

Pages from-to (Number of pages)

Pages 107-121 (15 pages)

Journal (Volume, Issue Number)

Educational Assessment (Volume 15, Issue 2)

Publication milestones

  • Published - 04/2010

Publication status

Published - 04/2010

ISSN

1062-7197

Publication IDs

  • Scopus: 77953711236

Publication metrics

Metrics

SciVal
citations
9
SciVal
FWCI
0.77
SciVal
Author count
2
SciVal
Paper percentile
61
Fractional count
1
Fractional count
0.50
Fractional count
1
Fractional count
0.50
Fractional count
1
Fractional count
1
Scopus
citations

PlumX, opens in new tab

Citation count
16
Captures
24