Skip to search boxSkip to navigationSkip to main content

Evaluating allied health inpatient rehabilitation educational materials in terms of health literacy

  • Elizabeth G. Hunter(corresponding author)
    ,
  • Mark Dignan
    ,
  • Sophia Shalash
*Corresponding author for this work
Scholary Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Sustainable Development Goals

  • SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well

Abstract

The purpose of this project was to assess and adapt inpatient rehabilitation educational materials in terms of reading level. Low health literacy has been shown to negatively impact health. Little health literacy research has been focused on rehabilitation settings. Written patient education materials were collected then analyzed for reading level. Focus groups were held with allied health practitioners to develop a plan to adapt them. A final focus group of former inpatient rehabilitation users was conducted to explore the end users perceptions of the original and revised materials. 90 pieces of patient education material were assessed. The average reading level of the original materials was 16th grade. A subset of 20 documents was chosen for revision. The average reading level was lowered to 5th grade with a range from 2nd to 8th. Clear communication for patient educational materials is a crucial first step to providing the best client-centered rehabilitation care. Vocabulary words, text formatting and "need to know" versus "nice to know" information were the most common problems in the original documents.

Publication Information

Output type

Scholary Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Original language

English (US)

Pages from-to (Number of pages)

Pages E33-E37

Journal (Volume, Issue Number)

Journal of allied health (Volume 41, Issue 2)

Publication milestones

  • Published - 06/2012

Publication status

Published - 06/2012

ISSN

0090-7421

Publication IDs

  • Scopus: 84864334205
  • PubMed: 22735823

Publication metrics

Metrics

Scopus
citations
Fractional count
1
Fractional count
0.33
Fractional count
2
Fractional count
0.67
Fractional count
1
Fractional count
1
SciVal
Author count
3
SciVal
Paper percentile
24

PlumX

Citation count
3
Captures
31