Skip to search boxSkip to navigationSkip to main content

Evaluation of implant abutment screw tightening protocols on reverse tightening values: An in vitro study

  • Abdullah H. Alnasser(corresponding author)
    ,
  • Chandur P.K. Wadhwani
    ,
  • ,
  • Mathew T. Kattadiyil
*Corresponding author for this work
  • Loma Linda University Health
    ,
  • Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University
    ,
  • University of California at Los Angeles
Scholary Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Abstract

Statement of problem: Implant abutment screw loosening is a common prosthetic complication of implant-supported crowns. However, reports that have objectively evaluated the effectiveness of different tightening protocols on reverse tightening values are sparse. Purpose: The purpose of this in vitro study was to determine the optimal tightening protocol for implant abutment screws. Material and methods: Fifty Neoss implants were randomly distributed to 5 groups (n=10). The implants received a cover screw and mounted, and the impression coping was tightened. Tightening was measured by using a digital measuring device. Then, the implant abutments were placed and tightened to 32 Ncm by using a Crystaloc screw. In Group 2T10I, the screws were tightened twice with an interval of 10 minutes between the first and second tightening. In Group 2T0I, the screws were tightened twice with no interval time. In Group 1T, the screws were tightened 1 time only. In Group TCT, the screws were tightened, counter-tightened, and then tightened again. In Group TCTCT, the abutment screws were tightened, counter-tightened, tightened, counter-tightened, and then tightened again. All the mounted implants were left in the same environment for 3 hours, and the reverse tightening values were then measured. Results: The mean reverse tightening values of the first 4 groups ranged from 21.49 Ncm to 22.57 Ncm, whereas the reverse tightening value for the fifth group was 25.51 Ncm. A significant difference was found among the groups (P<.05) with reverse tightening data. Conclusions: No significant difference was found in tightening the abutment screw 2 times with a 10-minute interval time, no interval time, or tightening it 1 time only. However, a significant difference was found in reverse tightening in the 3-time tightening and counter-tightening group.

Publication Information

Output type

Scholary Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Original language

English (US)

Pages from-to (Number of pages)

Pages 486-490 (5 pages)

Journal (Volume, Issue Number)

Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry (Volume 125, Issue 3)

Publication milestones

  • Published - 03/2021

Publication status

Published - 03/2021

ISSN

0022-3913

Publication IDs

  • Scopus: 85085093162
  • PubMed: 32416983

Publication metrics

Metrics

Fractional count
1
Fractional count
0.25
Fractional count
3
Fractional count
0.75
Fractional count
1
Fractional count
1
Scopus
citations

PlumX, opens in new tab

Citation count
13
Captures
38

Funding Details

The authors thank Neoss Company for providing the implants components to conduct this research.
FunderFunding numbers
Neoss Company
-