Skip to search boxSkip to navigationSkip to main content

Evaluation of the bond strengths of dentin bonding agents used to seal resected root apices

  • Dale A. Miles
    ,
  • Ronald W. Anderson
    ,
  • David H. Pashley
  • Unknown
Scholary Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Abstract

A number of improved dentin bonding agents have recently become available, but have not been evaluated on apical radicular dentin. The purpose of this study was to compare the tensile bond strengths of four adhesive resins on resected root ends before and after blood contamination. Forty single-rooted human incisors were cleaned and shaped and obturated. The apical 3 mm was then resected at a 45-degree angle, bonded, and tested for tensile bond strengths using an Instron machine. The bonding systems evaluated included Prisma Universal Bond 3, Scotchbond MultiPurpose Dental Adhesive, Amalgambond, and All Bond 2. All bonding systems were then covered with Prisma APH light-cure composite resin. Results indicated that the bond strengths of the blood contaminated groups were significantly less than those of the control groups, except in the case of Amalgambond where no significant difference was noted. When the surface was contaminated with blood, Prisma Universal Bond 3 had significantly lower bond strengths, whereas Amalgambond had significantly higher bond strengths than the other subgroups.

Publication Information

Output type

Scholary Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Original language

English (US)

Pages from-to (Number of pages)

Pages 538-541 (4 pages)

Journal (Volume, Issue Number)

Journal of endodontics (Volume 20, Issue 11)

Publication milestones

  • Published - 11/1994

Publication status

Published - 11/1994

ISSN

0099-2399

Publication IDs

  • Scopus: 0028540267
  • PubMed: 7643037

Publication metrics

Metrics

Fractional count
1
Fractional count
0.33
Fractional count
2
Fractional count
0.67
Fractional count
1
Fractional count
1
Scopus
citations

PlumX, opens in new tab

Citation count
23
Captures
31

Funding Details

This research was supported, in part, by Grant DE 06427 from the National institute of Dental Research and by the Medical College of Georgia Dental Research Center.
FundersFunding number
Medical College of Georgia Dental Research Center
-
National Institute of Dental Research
-
NIDCR
R01DE006427