Skip to search boxSkip to navigationSkip to main content

Examination of the factor structure of the disabilities of the arm, shoulder, and hand questionnaire

  • Leigh A. Lehman
    ,
  • Michelle Woodbury
    ,
  • Craig A. Velozo
  • University of South Carolina - Upstate
    ,
  • Medical University of South Carolina
    ,
  • Department of Veterans Affairs
    ,
  • University of Florida
    ,
  • Rehabilitation Outcomes Research Center
Scholary Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Abstract

OBJECTIVE. The Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) questionnaire is a global scale evaluating the impact of upper-extremity disorders. We sought to validate or challenge the unidimensional factor structure of the DASH. METHOD. Secondary analysis was performed on data collected from outpatient clinics. Factor analysis was performed in two steps, exploratory factor analysis (EFA) followed by confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). To provide further support for unidimensionality, fit statistics were calculated using the Andrich Rasch ratingscale model. RESULTS. EFA revealed three potential factors (eigenvalues = 18.40, 1.56, and 1.54). CFA was performed fitting a three-factor model. Tucker-Lewis Index (.99) and standardized root mean square residual (.05) values indicated good fit. Comparative fit index (.89) and root mean square error of approximation (.13) did not. When divided into three constructs, only one item misfit. CONCLUSION. More research is needed to determine situations in which division of the DASH may enhance interpretability.

Publication Information

Output type

Scholary Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Original language

English (US)

Pages from-to (Number of pages)

Pages 169-178 (10 pages)

Journal (Volume, Issue Number)

American Journal of Occupational Therapy (Volume 65, Issue 2)

Publication milestones

  • Published - 03/2011

Publication status

Published - 03/2011

ISSN

0272-9490

Publication IDs

  • Scopus: 79954529330
  • PubMed: 21476364

Publication metrics

Metrics

Scopus
citations
SciVal
citations
31
SciVal
FWCI
2.05
SciVal
Author count
3
SciVal
Paper percentile
85
Fractional count
1
Fractional count
0.33
Fractional count
2
Fractional count
0.67
Fractional count
1
Fractional count
1

PlumX, opens in new tab

Citation count
38
Captures
35