Skip to search boxSkip to navigationSkip to main content

Extraction of chronically implanted coronary sinus leads active fixation vs passive fixation leads

  • George H. Crossley(corresponding author)
    ,
  • ,
  • Derek V. Exner
    ,
  • Andrew D. Merliss
    ,
  • Serge M. Tobias
    ,
  • David O. Martin
*Corresponding author for this work
  • Vanderbilt University
    ,
  • ,
  • University of Calgary
    ,
  • Bryan Heart
    ,
  • Long Beach Memorial Women's Hospital
    ,
  • Cleveland Clinic Foundation
Scholary Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Abstract

Background The Medtronic model 4195 (StarFix) left ventricular lead is an active fixation lead that provides additional support within the coronary sinus (CS) via deployable lobes. While this lead has been shown to have excellent stability within the CS, concerns about its extractability have been raised. Objective The aim of this study was to compare the safety and efficacy of the extraction of the model 4195 lead vs other Medtronic CS leads in a prospective cohort study. Methods Patients undergoing extraction of this and other CS leads for standard indications were prospectively enrolled and studied. The primary outcomes of interest were the removal success rates and associated complication rates. Patients were followed for a month postprocedure. Results The overall left ventricular lead extraction success rate was 97.6% (n = 205). Among 40 patients with chronic model 4195 leads, there were 37 successful extractions (92.5%) as compared to 98.8% for the 165 non-4195 leads. However, in 2 of the 3 StarFix lead extraction failures, standard extraction techniques were not used. All 10 of the model 4195 leads that had been implanted for less than 6 months were extracted without incident. Conclusion In this largest study of CS lead extractions published to date, the overall success rate of the extraction of chronically implanted CS leads is high and the complication rate is similar in these lead models. The extraction of the model 4195 lead is clearly more challenging, but it can be accomplished in high-volume extraction centers with experienced operators. It is recommended that the model 4195 lead be extracted by experienced operators.

Publication Information

Output type

Scholary Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Original language

English (US)

Pages from-to (Number of pages)

Pages 1253-1259 (7 pages)

Journal (Volume, Issue Number)

Heart Rhythm (Volume 13, Issue 6)

Publication milestones

  • Published - 06/01/2016

Publication status

Published - 06/01/2016

ISSN

1547-5271

Publication IDs

  • Scopus: 84969718513
  • PubMed: 26829114

Publication metrics

Metrics

Scopus
citations
Fractional count
1
Fractional count
0.08
Fractional count
11
Fractional count
0.92
Fractional count
1
Fractional count
1
SciVal
citations
12
SciVal
FWCI
0.83
SciVal
Author count
12
SciVal
Paper percentile
76

PlumX, opens in new tab

Citation count
16
Captures
27

Funding Details

Dr Crossley serves as a consultant to Medtronic and Boston Scientific; he has received speaker fellowship support and research funding from Medtronic and fellowship support from Boston Scientific, St. Jude Medical, and SentreHEART. Dr Sorrentino has received consulting fees and honoraria from Medtronic. Dr Exner has received consulting fees and honoraria from Medtronic; he has also received fellowship support and research support from Medtronic. Dr Merliss has received consulting fees and honoraria from Medtronic. Dr Tobias has received consulting fees and honoraria from Medtronic. Dr Piccini has received grants for clinical research from ARCA Biopharma, Boston Scientific, Gilead, Johnson & Johnson, and ResMed; he serves as a consultant to Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Laguna Pharmaceuticals, Medtronic, and Spectranetics. Dr Schaerf serves as a consultant to and has received lecturer support from Medtronic, Biotronik, Spectranetics, Cook Medical, EBR Systems, and AngioDynamics. Dr Li receives salary from Medtronic. Dr Adler has received consulting fees and honoraria from Medtronic.
FundersFunding numbers
Boston Scientific , St. Jude Medical
-
Medtronic
-