Skip to search boxSkip to navigationSkip to main content

Factors associated with mortality in combat-related pelvic fractures.

  • Jana M. Davis(corresponding author)
    ,
  • Daniel J. Stinner
    ,
  • James R. Bailey
    ,
  • James K. Aden
    ,
  • Joseph R. Hsu
    ,
  • Trauma Research Consortium Skeletal Trauma Research Consortium
*Corresponding author for this work
  • United States Army
Scholary Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Open access

Abstract

Pelvic fractures were sustained by ≥26% of service members who died during Operation Enduring Freedom and Operation Iraqi Freedom in 2008. To determine factors associated with patient mortality following combat-related pelvic fracture (CRPF), the Joint Theater Trauma Registry database was searched to identify service members who survived CRPF sustained in the year 2008 (group 1), and the Armed Forces Medical Examiner System was searched to identify nonsurvivors of such trauma in the same year (group 2). Stable pelvic ring injuries were associated with a lower mortality rate than were unstable injuries when controlling for large-vessel and anatomic brain injuries (43% and 85%, respectively; P < 0.05). Associated injuries that were significant predictors of mortality included large-vessel, anatomic brain, cardiopulmonary, and solid organ abdominal (P < 0.05). Compared with a similar cohort of nonsurvivors, persons who survive CRPF have less severe pelvic fractures and associated injuries. In addition, pelvic fractures secondary to direct combat (ie, blast-related blunt injury, penetrating injury) were significantly more lethal than were those caused by mechanisms analogous to civilian trauma.

Publication Information

Output type

Scholary Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Original language

English (US)

Pages from-to (Number of pages)

Pages S7-12

Journal (Volume, Issue Number)

The Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (Volume 20 Suppl 1)

Publication milestones

  • Published - 2012

Publication status

Published - 2012

ISSN

1067-151X

Publication IDs

  • Scopus: 84866768778
  • PubMed: 22865141

Publication metrics

Metrics

Fractional count
1
Fractional count
0.17
Fractional count
5
Fractional count
0.83
Fractional count
1
Fractional count
1
Scopus
citations

PlumX, opens in new tab

Captures
33
Citation count
16