Skip to search boxSkip to navigationSkip to main content

Food motivation and owner feeding management practices are associated with overweight among Dog Aging Project participants

  • Kathleen Gartner
    ,
  • ,
  • Kellyn E. McNulty
    ,
  • Zihan Zheng
    ,
  • Audrey Ruple
    ,
  • Kate E. Creevy(corresponding author)
*Corresponding author for this work
  • Texas A&M University
    ,
  • ,
  • University of Washington
    ,
  • Virginia-Maryland College of Veterinary Medicine
Scholary Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Open access

Sustainable Development Goals

  • SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well

Abstract

Objective To evaluate the associations of dogs’ food motivation scores (FMS) and owners’ feeding management scores (OMS; a measure of intensity of dietary control) derived from the Dog Obesity Risk Assessment questionnaire with dog physical condition and to investigate the potential impact of several factors on dogs’ levels of food motivation. Methods Observational prospective study of US dogs enrolled in the Dog Aging Project from 2019 through 2021. Participating owners completed standardized questionnaires, including information about their dogs’ physical condition (overweight vs not overweight), and the Dog Obesity Risk and Appetite questionnaire for all dogs. Food motivation scores and OMS were calculated as percentages. Body condition scores for a subset of dogs were extracted from veterinary medical records. Results Questionnaire data (n = 13,890) and body condition score data (n = 200) were evaluated. Overweight physical condition was positively associated with OMS (OR, 1.06; 95% CI, 1.057 to 1.064 per OMS percentage point). Overweight physical condition was also positively associated with FMS (OR, 1.02; 95% CI, 1.014 to 1.019 per FMS percentage point). When controlling for age, sex, weight, and type of developed environment (rural, suburban, urban), FMS was higher (sporting, hound) or lower (nonsporting) for dogs from certain American Kennel Club breed groups compared to mixed-breed dogs. Conclusions Dog demographics and owner management choices are associated with physical condition in companion dogs. Clinical Relevance Heightened awareness of factors associated with companion dog overweight equips veterinarians to recognize dogs at risk. Client education and future research into weight-control strategies can be targeted to this at-risk population.

Publication Information

Output type

Scholary Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Original language

English (US)

Journal (Volume, Issue Number)

American Journal of Veterinary Research (Volume 86, Issue 5)

Publication milestones

  • Published - 05/2025

Publication status

Published - 05/2025

ISSN

0002-9645

Publication IDs

  • Scopus: 105004568064
  • PubMed: 40081321

Publication metrics

Metrics

Scopus
citations
Fractional count
1
Fractional count
0.17
Fractional count
5
Fractional count
0.83
Fractional count
1
Fractional count
1

PlumX, opens in new tab

Citation count
6
Captures
11
Social media
1
Mentions
7

Funding Details

lected by the Dog Aging Project, under U19 grant No. AG057377 (Principal Investigator: Daniel Promislow) from the National Institute on Aging, a part of the NIH, and by additional grants and private donations, including generous support from the Glenn Foundation for Medical Research, the Tiny Foundation Fund at Myriad Canada, and the WoodNext Foundation. Dr. Creevy, Dr. McNulty, and Dr. Ruple also received funding from U19 grant No. AG057377. Dr. Gartner was funded by NIH grant No. T35OD010991-16 and by the Texas A&M College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences. Dr. Hoffman is supported by NIH grant No. AG059920. These data are housed on the Terra platform at the Broad Institute of The Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Harvard. This research is based on publicly available data collected by the Dog Aging Project, under U19 grant No. AG057377 (Principal Investigator: Daniel Promislow) from the National Institute on Aging, a part of the NIH, and by additional grants and private donations, including generous support from the Glenn Foundation for Medical Research, the Tiny Foundation Fund at Myriad Canada, and the WoodNext Foundation. Dr. Creevy, Dr. McNulty, and Dr. Ruple also received funding from U19 grant No. AG057377. Dr. Gartner was funded by NIH grant No. T35OD010991-16 and by the Texas A&M College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences. Dr. Hoffman is supported by NIH grant No. AG059920. These data are housed on the Terra platform at the Broad Institute of The Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Harvard.
FundersFunding numbers
NIH
-
Tiny Foundation Fund at Myriad Canada
-
GFMR
-
MIT
-
NIA
-
WoodNext Foundation
T35OD010991-16
CVM
AG059920