Skip to search boxSkip to navigationSkip to main content

Herpetofaunal response to gap and skidder-rut wetland creation in a southern bottomland hardwood forest

*Corresponding author for this work
  • Clemson University
Scholary Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Abstract

We compared herpetofaunal communities in recently harvested gaps, skidder trails, and unharvested depressional wetlands to assess the effects of group-selection harvesting and skidder traffic on reptiles and amphibians in a southern bottomland hardwood forest. From January 1, 1997 to December 31, 1998 we captured 24,292 individuals representing 55 species of reptiles and amphibians at the Savannah River Site in Barnwell County, South Carolina. Forty-two species (n = 6,702 individuals) were captured in gaps, 43 species (n = 8,863 individuals) were captured along skid trails between gaps and 43 species (n = 8,727 individuals) were captured in bottomland depressions over the 2 yr period. Three vegetation variables and six environmental variables were correlated with herpetofaunal abundance. Salamander abundance, especially for species in the genus Ambystoma, was negatively associated with areas with less canopy cover and pronounced rutting (i.e., gaps and skidder trails). Alternatively, treefrog (Hylidae) abundance was positively associated with gap creation. Results from this study suggest that group selection harvests and skidder rutting may alter the herpetofaunal species composition in southern bottomland hardwoods by increasing habitat suitability for some species while diminishing it for others.

Publication Information

Output type

Scholary Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Original language

English (US)

Pages from-to (Number of pages)

Pages 407-413 (7 pages)

Journal (Volume, Issue Number)

Forest Science (Volume 48, Issue 2)

Publication milestones

  • Published - 05/2002

Publication status

Published - 05/2002

ISSN

0015-749X

Publication IDs

  • Scopus: 0036587322

Publication metrics

Metrics

Scopus
citations
Fractional count
1
Fractional count
0.33
Fractional count
2
Fractional count
0.67
Fractional count
1
Fractional count
1
SciVal
citations
23
SciVal
FWCI
0.89
SciVal
Author count
3
SciVal
Paper percentile
73

PlumX

Citation count
28
Captures
63