Skip to search boxSkip to navigationSkip to main content

Heterogeneity of treatment effects of long-acting injectable antipsychotic medications

  • T. Scott Stroup(corresponding author)
    ,
  • Natalie A. Bareis
    ,
  • Robert A. Rosenheck
    ,
  • Marvin S. Swartz
    ,
*Corresponding author for this work
Scholary Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Sustainable Development Goals

  • SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well

Abstract

Objective: To investigate subgroup responses to long-acting injectable (LAI) medications haloperidol decanoate (HD) and paliperidone palmitate (PP) in a randomized controlled trial that found no difference between the treatments on the primary outcome of efficacy failure. Methods: A Comparison of Long-Acting Injectable Medications for Schizophrenia (ACLAIMS) enrolled 311 participants from March 2011 to July 2013 meeting DSM-IV-TR criteria for diagnoses of schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder at risk of relapse due to medication nonadherence or substance abuse. Participants were randomly assigned to double-blinded treatment with HD or PP and followed for up to 2 years. A committee blinded to treatment assignment adjudicated efficacy failure on the basis of participants' meeting at least 1 of these criteria: psychiatric hospitalization, crisis stabilization, increased outpatient visits, could not discontinue oral antipsychotic, discontinued assigned LAI due to inadequate therapeutic benefit, or ongoing or repeated need for adjunctive oral antipsychotic medication. Survival analyses examined modification of treatment effects on efficacy failure by age, sex, race, substance abuse, baseline symptom severity, and baseline adherence. Mixed-effect linear models and analysis of covariance examined this modification on safety outcomes. Results: An interaction between age and treatment (P =.009) revealed younger participants assigned HD had longer time to efficacy failure than those assigned PP. Interactions were not significant between treatment group and sex, race, substance use disorder, baseline symptom severity, or baseline adherence. An interaction of treatment and age on akathisia (P =.047) found an advantage for PP that was larger among younger persons. An advantage for HD on serum prolactin levels was larger among younger women (P =.033). Conclusions: Among younger persons, HD was associated with lower rates of efficacy failure than P P. Age effects on adverse effects were mixed. Age-related heterogeneity of antipsychotic treatment effects warrants further investigation and consideration in clinical practice.

Publication Information

Output type

Scholary Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Original language

English (US)

Journal (Volume, Issue Number)

Journal of Clinical Psychiatry (Volume 80, Issue 1)

Publication milestones

  • Published - 01/2019

Publication status

Published - 01/2019

ISSN

0160-6689

Publication IDs

  • Scopus: 85058755324
  • PubMed: 30549494

Publication metrics

Metrics

SciVal
FWCI
0.21
SciVal
Author count
5
SciVal
citations
1
SciVal
Paper percentile
49
Fractional count
1
Fractional count
0.20
Fractional count
4
Fractional count
0.80
Fractional count
1
Fractional count
1
Scopus
citations

PlumX, opens in new tab

Mentions
1
Citation count
5
Captures
125

Funding Details

Submitted: January 3, 2018; accepted June 1, 2018. Published online: November 27, 2018. Potential conflicts of interest: Dr Stroup received a research grant from Auspex Pharmaceuticals. Dr McEvoy has received consulting fees, honoraria, or grants from Alkermes, Avanir, Boehringer Ingelheim, Neurocrine, Teva, and Otsuka. Drs Bareis, Swartz, and Rosenheck have no conflicts of interest to disclose. Funding/support: This study was funded by National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) grant R01MH081107. Dr Bareis was funded by NIMH grant 5T32MH020004-18.
FundersFunding numbers
Auspex Pharmaceuticals
-
NIMH
R01MH081107, 5T32MH020004-18