Skip to search boxSkip to navigationSkip to main content

High level of dioxin-TEQ in tissue is associated with Agent Orange exposure but not with biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy

*Corresponding author for this work
Scholary Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Research
Peer-review

Sustainable Development Goals

  • SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well

Abstract

Background:Agent Orange (AO) was previously identified as a significant risk factor for biochemical recurrence (BCR) after radical prostatectomy (RP) in prostate cancer patients. In this study, we determined the levels of dioxin biological toxicity using toxic equivalency (TEQ) values and examined the impact of dioxin-TEQ level on BCR.Methods:A total of 93 men who underwent RP, with a median of 5.3 years of postoperative follow-up, were included in the study. The dioxin-TEQ level of each patient was measured using intraoperatively harvested abdominal subcutaneous fat. The dichotomous categorization of dioxin-TEQ by the 50th percentile (low<50% vs high≥ 50%) was also used to regroup the patient cohort, regardless of the previous history of AO exposure. Comparisons between the dioxin-TEQ levels, clinicopathological characteristics and BCR in AO-exposed and-unexposed men were made to allocate possible risk factors. The multivariable logistic regression model was used to identify significant risk factors associated with BCR, adjusting for other confounding factors.Results:The median dioxin-TEQ level in 37 AO-exposed patients was significantly higher than that in 56 unexposed patients (22.3 vs 15.0 pg g-1 fat, respectively, P<0.001). The men with AO exposure were more likely to have a high dioxin-TEQ level (P<0.001). Neither AO exposure nor the level of dioxin-TEQ was associated with BCR. Tumor stage (T3/T4 vs T2) and Gleason grade (Gleason ≥3+4) were independent risk factors for BCR after RP.Conclusions:Exposure to AO significantly increases the adipose level of dioxin-TEQ in patients treated with RP. However, exposure to AO or a high dioxin-TEQ level was not associated with an increased risk of BCR after RP. This lack of association supports the current conclusion that the evidence of carcinogenicity of AO in prostate cancer patients is not sufficient and remains 'limited'.

Publication Information

Output type

Scholary Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Research
Peer-review

Original language

English (US)

Pages from-to (Number of pages)

Pages 376-381 (6 pages)

Journal (Volume, Issue Number)

Prostate Cancer and Prostatic Diseases (Volume 16, Issue 4)

Publication milestones

  • Published - 12/2013

Publication status

Published - 12/2013

ISSN

1365-7852

Publication IDs

  • Scopus: 84887607477
  • PubMed: 24018710

Publication metrics

Metrics

SciVal
citations
10
SciVal
FWCI
0.47
SciVal
Author count
6
SciVal
Paper percentile
66
Fractional count
2
Fractional count
0.33
Fractional count
4
Fractional count
0.67
Fractional count
2
Fractional count
1
Scopus
citations

PlumX, opens in new tab

Citation count
18
Captures
15

Funding Details

We thank William Kingsberry of the AO Office at the Charlie Norwood Veterans Affairs Medical Center for providing information regarding patients’ history of AO exposure and the duration of service at an AO-sprayed area. Funding Support: This study was funded by the Georgia Cancer Coalition.
FunderFunding numbers
GCC
-