Skip to search boxSkip to navigationSkip to main content

Histologic and Histomorphometric Comparison of Immediately Placed Hydroxyapatite-Coated and Titanium Plasma-Sprayed Implants: A Pilot Study in Dogs

  • Cuneyt Karabuda(corresponding author)
    ,
  • Peker Sandalli
    ,
  • Serdar Yalcin
    ,
  • David E. Steflik
    ,
  • Gregory R. Parr
*Corresponding author for this work
Scholary Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Abstract

The purpose of this pilot study was to make a histologic and histomorphometric comparison of hydroxyapatite- (HA) coated and titanium plasma-sprayed (TPS) root-form implants that were placed in 2 mongrel dogs immediately after extraction of mandibular premolars. After 8 weeks of healing, the implant-containing segments of the mandible were removed en bloc and bone blocks including implants were sectioned. Histologic and histomorphometric analyses were performed by evaluating bone sections. The mean bone contact percentage of HA-coated implants was 61.84 ± 7.84%, with a range of 52.09% to 75.7%, and the mean bone contact percentage of TPS implants was 51.35 ± 12.1%, with a range of 30.1% to 70.6%. This pilot study suggests that HA-coated implants placed into fresh extraction sockets can achieve better bone contact than TPS implants, but there was evidence that the surface of the HA layer can be resorbed, so long-term stability of HA coatings in immediate implantation must be investigated.

Publication Information

Output type

Scholary Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Original language

English (US)

Pages from-to (Number of pages)

Pages 510-515 (6 pages)

Journal (Volume, Issue Number)

International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants (Volume 14, Issue 4)

Publication milestones

  • Published - 1999

Publication status

Published - 1999

ISSN

0882-2786

Publication IDs

  • Scopus: 0033161275
  • PubMed: 10453665

Publication metrics

Metrics

SciVal
citations
40
SciVal
FWCI
1.77
SciVal
Author count
5
SciVal
Paper percentile
82
Scopus
citations
Fractional count
1
Fractional count
0.20
Fractional count
4
Fractional count
0.80
Fractional count
1
Fractional count
1

PlumX

Citation count
43
Captures
70