Skip to search boxSkip to navigationSkip to main content

Hydrogen and Methane-Based Breath Testing in Gastrointestinal Disorders: The North American Consensus

  • The North American Consensus group on hydrogen and methane-based breath testing
  • Cedars-Sinai Medical Center
    ,
  • ,
  • Harvard University
    ,
  • Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Medicas y Nutricion Salvador Zubiran
    ,
  • Saint Francis Hospital and Medical Center Hartford
    ,
  • Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center
Scholary Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Open access

Abstract

Objectives: Breath tests (BTs) are important for the diagnosis of carbohydrate maldigestion syndromes and small intestinal bacterial overgrowth (SIBO). However, standardization is lacking regarding indications for testing, test methodology and interpretation of results. A consensus meeting of experts was convened to develop guidelines for clinicians and research. Methods: Pre-meeting survey questions encompassing five domains; indications, preparation, performance, interpretation of results, and knowledge gaps, were sent to 17 clinician-scientists, and 10 attended a live meeting. Using an evidence-based approach, 28 statements were finalized and voted on anonymously by a working group of specialists. Results: Consensus was reached on 26 statements encompassing all five domains. Consensus doses for lactulose, glucose, fructose and lactose BT were 10, 75, 25 and 25 g, respectively. Glucose and lactulose BTs remain the least invasive alternatives to diagnose SIBO. BT is useful in the diagnosis of carbohydrate maldigestion, methane-associated constipation, and evaluation of bloating/gas but not in the assessment of oro-cecal transit. A rise in hydrogen of ≥20 p.p.m. by 90 min during glucose or lactulose BT for SIBO was considered positive. Methane levels ≥10 p.p.m. was considered methane-positive. SIBO should be excluded prior to BT for carbohydrate malabsorption to avoid false positives. A rise in hydrogen of ≥20 p.p.m. from baseline during BT was considered positive for maldigestion. Conclusions: BT is a useful, inexpensive, simple and safe diagnostic test in the evaluation of common gastroenterology problems. These consensus statements should help to standardize the indications, preparation, performance and interpretation of BT in clinical practice and research.

Publication Information

Output type

Scholary Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Original language

English (US)

Pages from-to (Number of pages)

Pages 775-784 (10 pages)

Journal (Volume, Issue Number)

American Journal of Gastroenterology (Volume 112, Issue 5)

Publication milestones

  • Published - 05/01/2017

Publication status

Published - 05/01/2017

ISSN

0002-9270

Publication IDs

  • Scopus: 85015715808
  • PubMed: 28323273

Publication metrics

Metrics

Fractional count
1
Fractional count
0.10
Fractional count
9
Fractional count
0.90
Fractional count
1
Fractional count
1
SciVal
FWCI
14.69
SciVal
Author count
10
SciVal
citations
231
SciVal
Paper percentile
99
SciVal
Top percentile
1
Scopus
citations

PlumX, opens in new tab

Captures
733
Mentions
12
Citation count
788
Social media
5

Funding Details

The consensus group meeting was supported in part by Commonwealth Laboratories (Commonwealth Laboratories, Boston, MA). Commonwealth Laboratories had no role in the election of committee members, determination of the topics of presentations/discussion, drafting or approving these consensus statements.
FunderFunding numbers
Commonwealth Laboratories
-