Skip to search boxSkip to navigationSkip to main content

I Understand How You Feel: The Language of Empathy in Virtual Clinical Training

  • Yulia A. Strekalova(corresponding author)
    ,
  • Janice L. Krieger
    ,
  • Jordan Neil
    ,
  • John P. Caughlin
    ,
  • ,
  • Aaron Kotranza
*Corresponding author for this work
  • University of Florida
    ,
  • University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
    ,
  • ShadowHealth
Scholary Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Abstract

Effective communication is one of the most fundamental aspects of successful patient care, and it frequently depends on the nurses’ ability to empathize with patients while finding effective ways to translate medical science into personally relevant health information. Skilled nurses are expected to understand the patient’s experiences and feelings and be able to communicate this understanding to the patient, but language strategies used to achieve the goal of empathic communication can vary. In this article, we employed the model of message design logics to evaluate what strategies nursing students (N = 343) used to express empathy during a simulated health history training. The results of this study advance our understanding of what constitutes a high-quality response to the disclosure of personal health history facts. In addition to providing a general framework for understanding empathic responses during health history assessment, the message design logic perspective highlights the differences in linguistic choices in simulated patient–provider conversations.

Publication Information

Output type

Scholary Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Original language

English (US)

Pages from-to (Number of pages)

Pages 61-79 (19 pages)

Journal (Volume, Issue Number)

Journal of Language and Social Psychology (Volume 36, Issue 1)

Publication milestones

  • Published - 2016

Publication status

Published - 2016

ISSN

0261-927X

Publication IDs

  • Scopus: 85006013122
  • ORCID: /0000-0003-3254-8823/work/60341874

Publication metrics

Metrics

Scopus
citations
SciVal
citations
11
SciVal
FWCI
2.04
SciVal
Author count
6
SciVal
Paper percentile
74
Fractional count
1
Fractional count
0.17
Fractional count
5
Fractional count
0.83
Fractional count
1
Fractional count
1

PlumX, opens in new tab

Citation count
19
Captures
75