Skip to search boxSkip to navigationSkip to main content

Immersing practitioners in the recovery model: An educational program evaluation

  • Scott A. Peebles
    ,
  • P. Alex Mabe
    ,
  • Gareth Fenley
    ,
  • Peter F. Buckley
    ,
  • Travis O. Bruce
    ,
  • Meera Narasimhan
Scholary Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Sustainable Development Goals

  • SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well

Abstract

The ascendance of the recovery movement in mental health care has led to the development and implementation of educational curricula for mental health providers to assist in mental health care system transformation efforts. The Medical College of Georgia (MCG) partnered with the Georgia State Department of Human Resources (DHR) to develop, implement, and evaluate such an educational curriculum for providers within an academic medical institution. This effort, entitled Project GREAT, led to the creation of a curriculum based on the SAMHSA-defined (2006) critical components of recovery. As an initial evaluation of educational curriculum effectiveness, the authors examined effects of the training program on recovery-based knowledge and recovery-consistent attitudes. We also compared MCG provider knowledge and attitudes to those of a similar group of providers at a neighboring medical institution who did not receive the intervention and training. Findings generally supported the effectiveness of the intervention in increasing providers' knowledge of recovery and a shift in recovery-supporting attitudes.

Publication Information

Output type

Scholary Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Original language

English (US)

Pages from-to (Number of pages)

Pages 239-245 (7 pages)

Journal (Volume, Issue Number)

Community Mental Health Journal (Volume 45, Issue 4)

Publication milestones

  • Published - 08/2009

Publication status

Published - 08/2009

ISSN

0010-3853

Publication IDs

  • Scopus: 68649098467
  • PubMed: 19554447

Publication metrics

Metrics

Scopus
citations
SciVal
citations
31
Fractional count
2
Fractional count
0.25
Fractional count
6
Fractional count
0.75
Fractional count
2
Fractional count
1
SciVal
FWCI
0.90
SciVal
Author count
8
SciVal
Paper percentile
82

PlumX, opens in new tab

Citation count
24
Captures
46