Impact of Predefined Angles and a Revised APPLES Mnemonic on Accuracy and Performance Time for Simulated Ultrasound-Guided Injections
- John W. Norbury(corresponding author),
- William Brader,
- Michael McIver,
- Stephen C. Charles,
- Vivek Sindhi,
- East Carolina University,
- Johns Hopkins University
Abstract
Objectives Our objective was to determine whether predefined angles would improve performance time and accuracy of ultrasound-guided procedures by novice operators and whether a revised APPLES (approach, position, perpendicular, lift, entry, sweep) mnemonic was a helpful guide for performing the procedure. Methods Participants attempted to hit targets in-plane and out-of-plane at different depths with a needle under ultrasound guidance with and without predefined angles. Participants were then asked if they thought that the mnemonic would be helpful when learning both methods for ultrasound-guided procedures. Results There were 120 participants all of whom had performed fewer than six ultrasound guided procedures. Accuracy increased in all groups when angles were provided; however, only the 3-cm in-plane approach achieved statistical significance. Performance time also achieved statistical significance in two of the four groups. Ninety-five percent of participants thought that the revised APPLES mnemonic would be helpful for learning and performing ultrasound-guided procedures in the future. Conclusions Predefined angles seem to positively impact procedure time and accuracy for some target depths, and the APPLES mnemonic could be a helpful mental checklist for many novice operators. These may be useful tools to facilitate safe and efficient ultrasound-guided procedures in the clinical space.
Publication Information
Output type
Original language
English (US)Pages from-to (Number of pages)
Pages 689-693 (5 pages)Journal (Volume, Issue Number)
American Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (Volume 100, Issue 7)Publication milestones
- Published - 2021
Publication status
ISSN
0894-9115Publication IDs
- Scopus: 85108385732
- PubMed: 33048894
- ORCID: /0000-0002-1834-7518/work/107901243
