Skip to search boxSkip to navigationSkip to main content

Impact of pretest on posttest knowledge scores with a Solomon Four research design

  • Sally P. Weinrich(corresponding author)
    ,
  • Rachelle Seger
    ,
  • Tim Curtsinger
    ,
  • Gwen Pumphrey
    ,
  • ,
  • Martin C. Weinrich
*Corresponding author for this work
Scholary Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Sustainable Development Goals

  • SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well

Abstract

There is a paucity of research on the effects of pretest measurement with prostate cancer screening. What effect does a pretest measurement have on posttest outcomes? This research reports knowledge of prostate cancer screening among men randomized to an Enhanced decision aid versus an Usual Care decision aid. Using a Solomon Four research design, there were a total of 198 men in 4 groups. Most of the sample was African American (78%), with a mean age of 52 years. The greatest posttest knowledge occurred with the Enhanced decision aid in contrast to the Usual Care. The Enhanced/Usual Care groups that had both a pretest and posttest and had received a previous digital rectal examination had the highest means (P = .015), with means of 9.1 and 7.0, respectively. Among men who had a previous digital rectal examination, the greatest increase in score occurred among men randomized to the Enhanced decision aid in contrast to the Usual Care decision aid, 2.9 versus 0.4 (P = .008). The outcome varied based on the status of (1) random group assignment of the Solomon Four design and (2) status of previous digital rectal examination. Implications for nurses include consideration 1 of a pretest to increase posttest knowledge scores.

Publication Information

Output type

Scholary Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Original language

English (US)

Pages from-to (Number of pages)

Pages E16-E28

Journal (Volume, Issue Number)

Cancer Nursing (Volume 30, Issue 5)

Publication milestones

  • Published - 09/2007

Publication status

Published - 09/2007

ISSN

0162-220X

Publication IDs

  • Scopus: 34548686854
  • PubMed: 17876174

Publication metrics

Metrics

Scopus
citations
SciVal
FWCI
0.14
SciVal
Author count
6
SciVal
citations
3
SciVal
Paper percentile
44
Fractional count
1
Fractional count
0.17
Fractional count
5
Fractional count
0.83
Fractional count
1
Fractional count
1

PlumX, opens in new tab

Citation count
8
Captures
49