Skip to search boxSkip to navigationSkip to main content

Implementation of an Integrated Biodimensional Method of Breast Augmentation with Anatomic, Highly Cohesive Silicone Gel Implants: Short-Term Results With the First 620 Consecutive Cases

  • Paolo Montemurro
    ,
  • Mouchammed Agko
    ,
  • Alessandro Quattrini Li
    ,
  • Stefano Avvedimento
    ,
  • Per Hedén
  • plastic surgeons in private practice in Stockholm, Sweden.
Scholary Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Abstract

Background: The previously described Akademikliniken (AK) method is a comprehensive approach to breast augmentation with form stable implants that has been shown to afford favorable outcomes when applied by experienced surgeons.

Objectives: To evaluate outcomes of a surgeon newly adopting this method at the beginning of his career.

Methods: A retrospective review of patients undergoing dual plane subpectoral augmentation with Style 410 implants between April 2009 and December 2014 was undertaken. The review was performed one year after the last operation. The first author (P.M.) performed all operations. Complications and reoperation rates were analyzed and correlated with patient and implant characteristics using the chi-square or Fisher's exact test, as appropriate.

Results: A total of 620 consecutive patients met the inclusion criteria with a mean follow up of 8 months (range, 1 week-60 months). Complications occurred in 14.8% of the patients: request for larger size (3.3%), rotation (3%), and Baker III/IV capsular contracture (2.2%) were the most common ones. Low implant projection was a statistically significant risk factor (P < 0.05) for the most common complication - request for a larger size. The overall reoperation rate was 8.7%. The most common indication for reoperation was request for larger size (2.2%) followed by rotation (2.2%) and capsular contracture (2%).

Conclusions: Breast augmentation with form stable anatomical implants requires a considerably different process. By implementing a systematic approach such as the AK method, novices in this terrain can expect to achieve reasonable outcomes.

Level of Evidence: 4.

Publication Information

Output type

Scholary Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Original language

English (US)

Pages from-to (Number of pages)

Pages 782-792 (11 pages)

Journal (Volume, Issue Number)

Aesthetic Surgery Journal (Volume 37, Issue 7)

Publication milestones

  • Published - 07/01/2017

Publication status

Published - 07/01/2017

ISSN

1090-820X

Publication IDs

  • PubMed: 28333220
  • Scopus: 85037714499
  • PubMed: 28333220

Publication metrics

Metrics

Scopus
citations
SciVal
FWCI
1.27
SciVal
Author count
5
SciVal
citations
12
SciVal
Paper percentile
79
Fractional count
1
Fractional count
0.20
Fractional count
4
Fractional count
0.80
Fractional count
1
Fractional count
1

PlumX, opens in new tab

Captures
28
Citation count
22