Skip to search boxSkip to navigationSkip to main content

In vitro precision of fit of computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing titanium and zirconium dioxide bars

  • Joannis Katsoulis(corresponding author)
    ,
  • Regina Mericske-Stern
    ,
  • Douglas M. Yates
    ,
  • Naomi Izutani
    ,
  • Norbert Enkling
    ,
  • Markus B. Blatz
*Corresponding author for this work
  • University of Bern
    ,
  • University of Pennsylvania
Scholary Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Abstract

Objectives. Optical scanners combined with computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) technology provide high accuracy in the fabrication of titanium (TIT) and zirconium dioxide (ZrO) bars. The aim of this study was to compare the precision of fit of CAD/CAM TIT bars produced with a photogrammetric and a laser scanner. Methods. Twenty rigid CAD/CAM bars were fabricated on one single edentulous master cast with 6 implants in the positions of the second premolars, canines and central incisors. A photogrammetric scanner (P) provided digitized data for TIT-P (n = 5) while a laser scanner (L) was used for TIT-L (n = 5). The control groups consisted of soldered gold bars (gold, n = 5) and ZrO-P with similar bar design. Median vertical distance between implant and bar platforms from non-tightened implants (one-screw test) was calculated from mesial, buccal and distal scanning electron microscope measurements. Results. Vertical microgaps were not significantly different between TIT-P (median 16 μm; 95% CI 10-27 μm) and TIT-L (25 μm; 13-32 μm). Gold (49 μm; 12-69 μm) had higher values than TIT-P (p = 0.001) and TIT-L (p = 0.008), while ZrO-P (35 μm; 17-55 μm) exhibited higher values than TIT-P (p = 0.023). Misfit values increased in all groups from implant position 23 (3 units) to 15 (10 units), while in gold and TIT-P values decreased from implant 11 toward the most distal implant 15. Significance. CAD/CAM titanium bars showed high precision of fit using photogrammetric and laser scanners. In comparison, the misfit of ZrO bars (CAM/CAM, photogrammetric scanner) and soldered gold bars was statistically higher but values were clinically acceptable.

Publication Information

Output type

Scholary Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Original language

English (US)

Pages from-to (Number of pages)

Pages 945-953 (9 pages)

Journal (Volume, Issue Number)

Dental Materials (Volume 29, Issue 9)

Publication milestones

  • Published - 09/2013

Publication status

Published - 09/2013

ISSN

0109-5641

Publication IDs

  • Scopus: 84882454044
  • PubMed: 23890960

Publication metrics

Metrics

Fractional count
1
Fractional count
0.17
Fractional count
5
Fractional count
0.83
Fractional count
1
Fractional count
1
SciVal
FWCI
1.23
SciVal
Author count
6
SciVal
citations
23
SciVal
Paper percentile
82
Scopus
citations

PlumX, opens in new tab

Captures
114
Citation count
39

Funding Details

This study was supported by Allshape AG (Lengnau, Switzerland), Cendres+Métaux SA (Biel/Bienne, Switzerland) and Nobel Biocare AG (Zürich, Switzerland) providing the bar materials and in part measurement costs. The authors are thankful to the dental technicians Daniel Vallata (Vallata Dentaltechnik, Grenchen, Switzerland) and Beat Heckendorn (Art-Dent AG, Bern, Switzerland) for their contributions. Dr. Michael Vock (Institute of Mathematical Statistics and Actuarial Science, University of Bern, Switzerland) is acknowledged for statistical consulting.
FundersFunding numbers
Allshape AG
-
Nobel Biocare
-