Skip to search boxSkip to navigationSkip to main content

Incongruence between histologic and endoscopic diagnoses of Barrett's esophagus using transnasal esophagoscopy

  • Stacey L. Halum
    ,
  • Gregory N. Postma
    ,
  • Dwight D. Bates
    ,
  • Jamie A. Koufman(corresponding author)
*Corresponding author for this work
  • Wake Forest University
Scholary Output:
Contribution to journal
Review article
Peer-review

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The symptoms, patterns of reflux, and clinical manifestations of laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) differ from those of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) in many ways. The purposes of this study were to determine the prevalence of Barrett's esophagus in patients with LPR using transnasal esophagoscopy (TNE) and to determine if there is agreement between TNE clinical findings and pathology results when using TNE for Barrett's screening. STUDY DESIGN: This study involved a retrospective review of the records of 200 consecutive patients with LPR undergoing esophageal screening. METHODS: The prevalence of patients with findings clinically suspicious for Barrett's and the biopsy results for those patients were reviewed. RESULTS: Of the 200 patients with LPR who were screened with TNE, 10% (20 of 200) had findings suspicious for Barrett's esophagus, and, of those, only 30% (six of 20) had biopsy-proven Barrett's metaplasia. CONCLUSION: Although TNE may be a useful screening tool for Barrett's, there is incongruence between TNE findings and biopsy results, which likely reflects suboptimal biopsy methods with TNE. New biopsy techniques such as the CDx brush biopsy may enhance the sensitivity of TNE biopsies, and future studies are needed in this area.

Publication Information

Output type

Scholary Output:
Contribution to journal
Review article
Peer-review

Original language

English (US)

Pages from-to (Number of pages)

Pages 303-306 (4 pages)

Journal (Volume, Issue Number)

Laryngoscope (Volume 116, Issue 2)

Publication milestones

  • Published - 02/2006

Publication status

Published - 02/2006

ISSN

0023-852X

Publication IDs

  • Scopus: 33645778802
  • PubMed: 16467724

Publication metrics

Metrics

Scopus
citations
SciVal
citations
12
Fractional count
1
Fractional count
0.25
Fractional count
3
Fractional count
0.75
Fractional count
1
Fractional count
1
SciVal
FWCI
1.63
SciVal
Author count
4
SciVal
Paper percentile
64

PlumX, opens in new tab

Citation count
16
Mentions
1
Captures
15