Skip to search boxSkip to navigationSkip to main content

Inflammatory Markers in Schizophrenia: Comparing Antipsychotic Effects in Phase 1 of the Clinical Antipsychotic Trials of Intervention Effectiveness Study

  • Jonathan M. Meyer(corresponding author)
    ,
  • ,
  • Vicki G. Davis
    ,
  • Donald C. Goff
    ,
  • Henry A. Nasrallah
    ,
  • Sonia M. Davis
*Corresponding author for this work
  • University of California at San Diego
    ,
  • Department of Veterans Affairs
    ,
  • ,
  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
    ,
  • Harvard University
    ,
  • University of Cincinnati
Scholary Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Open access

Abstract

Background: C-reactive protein (CRP), intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM-1), vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 (VCAM-1), and E-selectin are systemic inflammatory markers (IM) that positively correlate with cardiovascular (CV) risk. Despite the known CV effects of atypical antipsychotics, there is limited prospective data on IM changes during treatment. Methods: The IM outcomes were compared between antipsychotic treatment groups in the CATIE (Clinical Antipsychotic Trials of Intervention Effectiveness) schizophrenia trial phase 1 with subjects with laboratory assessments at baseline and 3 months (n = 789). Results: There were significant treatment differences in CRP, E-selectin, and ICAM-1 at 3 months, with a differential impact of baseline values on the CRP and ICAM-1 results. In overall comparisons, quetiapine and olanzapine had the highest median levels for CRP, and olanzapine for E-selectin and ICAM-1. Olanzapine was significantly different after baseline adjustment than perphenazine (p = .001) for E-selectin, and in those with low baseline CRP (<1 mg/L), olanzapine was significantly different than perphenazine (p < .001), risperidone (p < .001), and ziprasidone (p = .002) for CRP. Perphenazine had the lowest 3-month ICAM-1 levels in subjects with baseline ICAM-1 above the median, but the differences were not statistically significant versus olanzapine (p = .010), quetiapine (p = .010), and risperidone (p = .006) after controlling for multiple comparisons. The 18-month repeated measures CRP analysis confirmed the significantly higher values for olanzapine in those with low baseline CRP. Conclusions: This analysis provides further evidence for differential antipsychotic metabolic liabilities as measured by changes in systemic inflammation. C-reactive protein might emerge as a useful target for CV risk outcomes in schizophrenia patients.

Publication Information

Output type

Scholary Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Original language

English (US)

Pages from-to (Number of pages)

Pages 1013-1022 (10 pages)

Journal (Volume, Issue Number)

Biological Psychiatry (Volume 66, Issue 11)

Publication milestones

  • Published - 12/01/2009

Publication status

Published - 12/01/2009

ISSN

0006-3223

Publication IDs

  • Scopus: 70449520471
  • PubMed: 19640511

Publication metrics

Metrics

SciVal
FWCI
1.45
SciVal
Author count
10
SciVal
citations
81
SciVal
Paper percentile
94
SciVal
Top percentile
10
Scopus
citations
Fractional count
1
Fractional count
0.10
Fractional count
9
Fractional count
0.90
Fractional count
1
Fractional count
1

PlumX, opens in new tab

Captures
110
Citation count
101

Funding Details

We wish to acknowledge the contributions of all investigators, study personnel, and subjects from all of the CATIE schizophrenia trial sites. We would also like to acknowledge Dr. Gregory D. Sempowski and Mr. Jeffery Hale of the Duke University Human Vaccine Institute for performing the multiplex biomarker assays. Dr. Sempowski's laboratory is partially supported by the Duke Center for Translational Research (AI51445) and the Duke Translational Medicine Institute (CTSA-UL1-RR-24128) to facilitate translational research. The Clinical Antipsychotic Trials of Intervention Effectiveness program was supported by National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) Grant # N01MH90001. The NIMH and study principal investigators are responsible for the design and conduct of the trial and the primary analyses. There is no industry involvement in these activities.