Skip to search boxSkip to navigationSkip to main content

Influence of hydrostatic pulpal pressure on the microtensile bond strength of all-in-one self-etching adhesives

  • Keiichi Hosaka(corresponding author)
    ,
  • Masatoshi Nakajima
    ,
  • Francesca Monticelli
    ,
  • Marcela Carrilho
    ,
  • Monica Yamauti
    ,
  • Juthatip Aksornmuang
*Corresponding author for this work
  • Institute of Science Tokyo
    ,
  • University of Siena
    ,
  • University of Granada
    ,
  • Universidade Estadual de Campinas
    ,
  • FEAD
    ,
  • Prince of Songkla University
Scholary Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the microtensile bond strength (μTBS) of two all-in-one self-etching adhesive systems and two self-etching adhesives with and without simulated hydrostatic pulpal pressure (PP). Materials and Methods: Flat coronal dentin surfaces of extracted human molars were prepared. Two all-in-one self-etching adhesive systems, One-Up Bond F (OBF; Tokuyama) and Clearfil S3 Bond (Tri-S, Kuraray Medical) and two self-etching primer adhesives, Clearfil Protect Bond (PB; Kuraray) and Clearfil SE Bond (SE; Kuraray) were applied to the dentin surfaces according to manufacturers' instructions under either a pulpal pressure (PP) of zero or 15 cm H 2O. A hybrid resin composite (Clearfil AP-X, Kuraray) was used for the coronal buildup. Specimens bonded under PP were stored in water at 37°C under 15 cm H2O for 24 h. Specimens not bonded under PP were stored under a PP of zero. After storage, the bonded specimens were sectioned into slabs that were trimmed to hourglass-shaped specimens, and were subjected to microtensile bond testing (μTBS). The bond strength data were statistically analyzed using two-way ANOVA and the Holm-Sidak method for multiple comparison tests (α = 0.05). The surface area percentage of different failure modes for each material was also statistically analyzed with three one-way ANOVAs and Tukey's multiple comparison tests. Results: The μTBS of OBF and Tri-S fell significantly under PP. However, in the PB and SE bonded specimens under PP, there were no significant differences compared with the control groups without PP. Conclusions: The μTBS of the two all-in-one adhesive systems decreased when PP was applied. However, the μTBS of both self-etching primer adhesives did not decrease under PP.

Publication Information

Output type

Scholary Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Original language

English (US)

Pages from-to (Number of pages)

Pages 437-442 (6 pages)

Journal (Volume, Issue Number)

Journal of Adhesive Dentistry (Volume 9, Issue 5)

Publication milestones

  • Published - 2007

Publication status

Published - 2007

ISSN

1461-5185

Publication IDs

  • Scopus: 36048951747
  • PubMed: 18297824

Publication metrics

Metrics

Fractional count
2
Fractional count
0.20
Fractional count
8
Fractional count
0.80
Fractional count
2
Fractional count
1
SciVal
FWCI
1.26
SciVal
Author count
10
SciVal
citations
26
SciVal
Paper percentile
78
Scopus
citations

PlumX

Citation count
34
Captures
41