Skip to search boxSkip to navigationSkip to main content

Intensive vs Standard Treatment of Hyperglycemia and Functional Outcome in Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke: The SHINE Randomized Clinical Trial

  • Karen C. Johnston(corresponding author)
    ,
  • ,
  • Qi Pauls
    ,
  • Christiana E. Hall
    ,
  • Kevin M. Barrett
    ,
  • William Barsan
*Corresponding author for this work
  • University of Virginia
    ,
  • ,
  • Medical University of South Carolina
    ,
  • University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
    ,
  • Mayo Clinic Rochester, MN
    ,
  • University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
Scholary Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Open access

Sustainable Development Goals

  • SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well

Abstract

Importance: Hyperglycemia during acute ischemic stroke is common and is associated with worse outcomes. The efficacy of intensive treatment of hyperglycemia in this setting remains unknown. Objectives: To determine the efficacy of intensive treatment of hyperglycemia during acute ischemic stroke. Design, Setting, and Participants: The Stroke Hyperglycemia Insulin Network Effort (SHINE) randomized clinical trial included adult patients with hyperglycemia (glucose concentration of >110 mg/dL if had diabetes or ≥150 mg/dL if did not have diabetes) and acute ischemic stroke who were enrolled within 12 hours from stroke onset at 63 US sites between April 2012 and August 2018; follow-up ended in November 2018. The trial included 1151 patients who met eligibility criteria. Interventions: Patients were randomized to receive continuous intravenous insulin using a computerized decision support tool (target blood glucose concentration of 80-130 mg/dL [4.4-7.2 mmol/L]; intensive treatment group: n = 581) or insulin on a sliding scale that was administered subcutaneously (target blood glucose concentration of 80-179 mg/dL [4.4-9.9 mmol/L]; standard treatment group: n = 570) for up to 72 hours. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary efficacy outcome was the proportion of patients with a favorable outcome based on the 90-day modified Rankin Scale score (a global stroke disability scale ranging from 0 [no symptoms or completely recovered] to 6 [death]) that was adjusted for baseline stroke severity. Results: Among 1151 patients who were randomized (mean age, 66 years [SD, 13.1 years]; 529 [46%] women, 920 [80%] with diabetes), 1118 (97%) completed the trial. Enrollment was stopped for futility based on prespecified interim analysis criteria. During treatment, the mean blood glucose level was 118 mg/dL (6.6 mmol/L) in the intensive treatment group and 179 mg/dL (9.9 mmol/L) in the standard treatment group. A favorable outcome occurred in 119 of 581 patients (20.5%) in the intensive treatment group and in 123 of 570 patients (21.6%) in the standard treatment group (adjusted relative risk, 0.97 [95% CI, 0.87 to 1.08], P =.55; unadjusted risk difference, -0.83% [95% CI, -5.72% to 4.06%]). Treatment was stopped early for hypoglycemia or other adverse events in 65 of 581 patients (11.2%) in the intensive treatment group and in 18 of 570 patients (3.2%) in the standard treatment group. Severe hypoglycemia occurred only among patients in the intensive treatment group (15/581 [2.6%]; risk difference, 2.58% [95% CI, 1.29% to 3.87%]). Conclusions and Relevance: Among patients with acute ischemic stroke and hyperglycemia, treatment with intensive vs standard glucose control for up to 72 hours did not result in a significant difference in favorable functional outcome at 90 days. These findings do not support using intensive glucose control in this setting. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01369069.

Publication Information

Output type

Scholary Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Original language

English (US)

Pages from-to (Number of pages)

Pages 326-335 (10 pages)

Journal (Volume, Issue Number)

JAMA - Journal of the American Medical Association (Volume 322, Issue 4)

Publication milestones

  • Published - 07/23/2019

Publication status

Published - 07/23/2019

ISSN

0098-7484

Publication IDs

  • Scopus: 85069770209
  • PubMed: 31334795

Publication metrics

Metrics

SciVal
citations
73
Fractional count
1
Fractional count
0.10
Fractional count
9
Fractional count
0.90
Fractional count
1
Fractional count
1
SciVal
FWCI
21.43
SciVal
Author count
10
SciVal
Paper percentile
99
SciVal
Top percentile
1
Scopus
citations

PlumX, opens in new tab

Citation count
387
Social media
1
Usage
16
Mentions
17
Captures
374

Funding Details

Funding/Support: This study was funded by grants U01 NS069498, U01 NS056975, and U01 NS059041 from the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke. The Medical Decision Network LLC provided the Glucostabilizer software at no cost.
FundersFunding number
NINDS
-
NCATS
UL1TR003167