Skip to search boxSkip to navigationSkip to main content

Interfacial strength of Resilon and gutta-percha to intraradicular dentin

  • Andrea Gesi
    ,
  • Ornella Raffaelli
    ,
  • Cecilia Goracci
    ,
  • David H. Pashley
    ,
  • Franklin R. Tay(corresponding author)
    ,
  • Marco Ferrari
*Corresponding author for this work
  • University of Siena
    ,
  • ,
  • The University of Hong Kong
Scholary Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Abstract

Strengthening of Resilon-filled roots via an adhesive interface should be reflected by improvement in the interfacial strength and dislocation resistance between the root fillings and intraradicular dentin. This study compared the interfacial strengths of Resilon/Epiphany and gutta-percha/AH Plus using a thin-slice push-out test design. Failure modes of root slices after push-out testing were examined with environmental scanning electron microscopy. The gutta-percha group exhibited significantly higher interfacial strength than the Resilon group, when premature failures that occurred in Resilon root slices were included in the statistical analysis. The gutta-percha root slices failed exclusively along the gutta-percha/sealer interface. The Resilon root slices failed predominantly along the sealer/dentin interface with recognizable, fractured resin tags. Detachment of the Resilon from the Epiphany sealer was also surprisingly observed in some specimens. The similarly low interfacial strengths achieved with both types of root filling challenges the concept of strengthening root-filled teeth with the new endodontic material.

Publication Information

Output type

Scholary Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Original language

English (US)

Pages from-to (Number of pages)

Pages 809-813 (5 pages)

Journal (Volume, Issue Number)

Journal of endodontics (Volume 31, Issue 11)

Publication milestones

  • Published - 11/2005

Publication status

Published - 11/2005

ISSN

0099-2399

Publication IDs

  • Scopus: 27644473061
  • PubMed: 16249724

Publication metrics

Metrics

Scopus
citations
SciVal
FWCI
7.68
SciVal
Author count
6
SciVal
citations
135
SciVal
Paper percentile
96
SciVal
Top percentile
5
Fractional count
2
Fractional count
0.33
Fractional count
4
Fractional count
0.67
Fractional count
2
Fractional count
1

PlumX, opens in new tab

Citation count
157
Captures
149

Funding Details

FunderFunding number
NIDCR
R01DE015306