Skip to search boxSkip to navigationSkip to main content

Interobserver agreement among endosonographers for staging of pancreatic cancer by endoscopic ultrasound

  • F. Gress
    ,
  • D. Ciaccia
    ,
  • C. Schmitt
    ,
  • M. Catalano
    ,
  • J. Affronti
    ,
  • K. Binmoeller
Scholary Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Sustainable Development Goals

  • SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well

Abstract

Endoscopic Ultrasound (EUS) has been reported to be an accurate modality for staging pancreatic cancer (CA). However, there is limited data regarding the effects of interobserver variation on the overall accuracy and clinical utility of EUS for staging pancreatic CA. AIM OF STUDY: To determine interobserver reliability for EUS staging of pancreatic tumors. METHODS: Twelve patients with previously diagnosed pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma underwent staging with EUS. Surgical correlation was obtained in all patients. A blinded observer developed a study videotape of real-time EUS for each case. The videotape was then distributed to ten endosonographers with at least one year of previous experience who independently reviewed the tape and recorded their interpretation of the EUS tumor stage for each case based upon previously reported EUS criteria for staging pancreatic CA. A multiple observer kappa (k) statistic was calculated for each staging category (T, N, and T+N), vascular invasion and overall k. Kappa accounts for agreement due to chance alone and standardized ranges are available. The Light (G) statistic was utilized to allow for the presence of the gold standard. Accuracy was assessed using a simple matrix format. RESULTS: Overall agreement was highly statistically significant for T stage: k=0.22 ( G=5.52, Z=2.35, p<0.01).Observers were more likely to agree with T3 stage tumors (94%) than T2 (40%) or T1 (33%) lesions. The Overall agreement for N stage was highly statistically significant: k=0.23 (G=4.44, Z=4.90, p<0.01). Agreement for absence of nodal involvement (63%) was better than that for the presence of nodal involvement (56%). For overall staging (T+N): k=0.18 (G=9.19, Z=4.98, p<,01). For vascular invasion: k=0.26 (G=3.90, z=3.33, p<.01). The agreement for T and N stage improved as stage increased (p<0.01) and in the presence of vascular invasion (p<0.01). CONCLUSION: Interobserver agreement is good for staging pancreatic tumors by EUS. However, it appears to be better for some tumor stages than others. Experience may play a role in the successful use of this modality to evaluate pancreatic tumors.

Publication Information

Output type

Scholary Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Original language

English (US)

Pages from-to (Number of pages)

Pages AB174

Journal (Volume, Issue Number)

Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (Volume 45, Issue 4)

Publication milestones

  • Published - 1997

Publication status

Published - 1997

ISSN

0016-5107

Publication IDs

  • Scopus: 4243797045

Publication metrics

Metrics

SciVal
FWCI
0.23
SciVal
Author count
14
SciVal
citations
2
SciVal
Paper percentile
38
Scopus
citations
Fractional count
1
Fractional count
0.07
Fractional count
13
Fractional count
0.93
Fractional count
1
Fractional count
1