Interpretation of biomonitoring data in clinical medicine and the exposure sciences
- Bryan L. Williams(corresponding author),
- Dana B. Barr,
- J. Michael Wright,
- Brian Buckley,
- Melina S. Magsumbol
- ,
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention,
- United States Environmental Protection Agency,
- Rutgers - The State University of New Jersey, Newark,
- University of Tennessee Health Science Center
Scholary Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-reviewAbstract
Biomonitoring has become a fundamental tool in both exposure science and clinical medicine. Despite significant analytical advances, the clinical use of environmental biomarkers remains in its infancy. Clinical use of environmental biomarkers poses some complex scientific and ethical challenges. The purpose of this paper is compare how the clinical and exposure sciences differ with respect to their interpretation and use of biological data. Additionally, the clinical use of environmental biomonitoring data is discussed. A case study is used to illustrate the complexities of conducting biomonitoring research on highly vulnerable populations in a clinical setting.
Publication Information
Output type
Scholary Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-reviewOriginal language
English (US)Pages from-to (Number of pages)
Pages 76-80 (5 pages)Journal (Volume, Issue Number)
Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology (Volume 233, Issue 1)Publication milestones
- Published - 11/15/2008
Publication status
Published - 11/15/2008
ISSN
0041-008XPublication IDs
- Scopus: 55649087353
- PubMed: 18561969
Publication metrics
Metrics
SciVal
citations
6
Fractional count
1
Fractional count
0.20
Fractional count
4
Fractional count
0.80
Fractional count
1
Fractional count
1
SciVal
FWCI
0.24
SciVal
Author count
5
SciVal
Paper percentile
53
PlumX, opens in new tab
Captures
14
Citation count
7
Funding Details
FunderFunding number
NIEHS
P30ES005022
