Skip to search boxSkip to navigationSkip to main content

Investigation of falsified documents via direct analyte-probed nanoextraction coupled to nanospray mass spectrometry, fluorescence microscopy, and Raman spectroscopy

  • V. Huynh
    ,
  • K. C. Williams
    ,
  • T. D. Golden
    ,
  • G. F. Verbeck(corresponding author)
*Corresponding author for this work
  • University of North Texas
Scholary Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Abstract

Microscopy with direct analyte-probed nanoextraction coupled to nanospray ionization mass spectrometry (DAPNe-NSI-MS) is a direct extraction technique that extracts ultra-trace amounts of analyte. It has been proven to extract ink from documents with little to no physical or chemical footprint. In this study, DAPNe has been coupled to Raman spectroscopy, fluorescence microscopy, and NSI-MS to determine if an ink entry from a document was falsified. A handwritten number was altered using a different ink pen to test if the aforementioned techniques could discriminate the original number from the altered number, qualitatively and/or quantitatively. Chemical species from part of the original number, altered number, and a point at which both inks intersect were successfully differentiated by all techniques when using different pens. DAPNe coupled to fluorescence microscopy and Raman spectroscopy was not able to discriminate the forged ink entry when the exact same pen was used to modify the text (due to the same ink formula). However, DAPNe-NSI-MS successfully discerned that the pen was dispensed on different days by quantitating the oxidation process.

Publication Information

Output type

Scholary Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Original language

English (US)

Pages from-to (Number of pages)

Pages 6553-6562 (10 pages)

Journal (Volume, Issue Number)

Analyst (Volume 140, Issue 19)

Publication milestones

  • Published - 10/07/2015

Publication status

Published - 10/07/2015

ISSN

0003-2654

Publication IDs

  • Scopus: 84941710990

Publication metrics

Metrics

Scopus
citations
Fractional count
1
Fractional count
0.25
Fractional count
3
Fractional count
0.75
Fractional count
1
Fractional count
1

PlumX, opens in new tab

Captures
22
Citation count
17