Skip to search boxSkip to navigationSkip to main content

Is it the technology or the teacher? A comparison of online and traditional english composition classes

  • William Finlay(corresponding author)
    ,
  • Christy Desmet
    ,
  • Lorraine Evans
*Corresponding author for this work
  • University of Georgia
Scholary Output:
Contribution to journal
Review article
Peer-review

Open access

Abstract

Recent reviews of the literature on distance learning have reached two general conclusions. First, students are about as satisfied with the quality of their education in distance-learning (DL) classes as they are in traditional or face-to-face (FTF) classes. Second, students perform about as well in DL classes as they do in FTF classes. We examine this finding of "no significant difference" in a study of students at a public university in the Southeast who were enrolled in online and FTF versions of the same English Composition course. We looked at three student outcomes: satisfaction, learning, and participation in classroom discussion. We found that being in an online class had a positive effect on satisfaction and participation, but no effect on learning even when we controlled for instructor behaviors and classroom characteristics. We attribute the positive effect of being in an online class on student satisfaction - which directly contradicts the no-significant-difference assumption - to the way in which synchronous instruction mimics the traditional classroom. Our findings attest to the importance of both technology and instruction on student satisfaction, learning, and participation.

Publication Information

Output type

Scholary Output:
Contribution to journal
Review article
Peer-review

Original language

English (US)

Pages from-to (Number of pages)

Pages 163-180 (18 pages)

Journal (Volume, Issue Number)

Journal of Educational Computing Research (Volume 31, Issue 2)

Publication milestones

  • Published - 12/01/2004

Publication status

Published - 12/01/2004

ISSN

0735-6331

Publication IDs

  • Scopus: 13544258908

Publication metrics

Metrics

SciVal
FWCI
0.24
SciVal
Author count
3
SciVal
citations
15
SciVal
Paper percentile
65
Scopus
citations
Fractional count
1
Fractional count
0.33
Fractional count
2
Fractional count
0.67
Fractional count
1
Fractional count
1

PlumX, opens in new tab

Citation count
20
Captures
51