Skip to search boxSkip to navigationSkip to main content

Is there a difference in outcome after radical prostatectomy between patients with biopsy Gleason sums 4, 5, and 6? Results from the SEARCH database

  • S. J. Freedland(corresponding author)
    ,
  • C. L. Amling
    ,
  • ,
  • J. C. Presti
    ,
  • W. J. Aronson
    ,
  • D. Elashoff
*Corresponding author for this work
  • University of California at Los Angeles
    ,
  • Naval Medical Center San Diego
    ,
  • ,
  • Stanford University
    ,
  • VA Medical Center
    ,
  • University of California at San Francisco
Scholary Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Sustainable Development Goals

  • SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well

Abstract

Purpose: Fewer patients newly diagnosed with prostate cancer today have biopsy Gleason sums < 6 compared to several years ago. Several tables and nomograms for predicting disease recurrence after definitive therapy provide little or no discrimination between biopsy Gleason sums 4, 5, and 6. We sought to examine the significance of biopsy Gleason sum for predicting biochemical failure following radical prostatectomy (RP) for men with biopsy Gleason sums of 4, 5, and 6. Materials and methods: We examined data from 988 men treated with RP between 1988 and 2002 who had biopsy Gleason sums of 4-6. Clinical and pathological variables as well as outcome information were compared between men with biopsy Gleason sums of 4-6. The log-rank and Cox proportional hazards analysis were used to determine whether biopsy Gleason sum provided unique prognostic information for men with low biopsy Gleason sums undergoing RP. Results: There was statistically significant, but overall weak correlation between biopsy Gleason sum and Gleason sum of the RP specimen (Spearman's r = 0.277, P < 0.001). As biopsy Gleason sum increased from 4 to 5 to 6, there was a steady rise (HR = 1.31 for each one point increase in Gleason sum, Cox's model) in the risk of PSA failure (P = 0.025, log-rank). On multivariate analysis comparing biopsy Gleason sum, preoperative PSA, clinical stage, year of surgery, percent of biopsy cores positive, and age for their ability to predict time to biochemical recurrence, only PSA (HR 2.09, CI 1.56-2.80, P < 0.001) and biopsy Gleason sum (HR 1.33, CI 1.05-1.70, P = 0.019) were significant independent predictors of PSA failure. Conclusions: Despite weak correlation between biopsy and pathologic Gleason sum among men with biopsy Gleason sum 4-6 tumors, grade was a significant independent predictor of PSA failure following RP. In the range of 4-6, biopsy Gleason sum acted as a continuous variable for predicting PSA failure. The routine use of Gleason sums 4 and 5 to grade prostate needle biopsy specimens should not be abandoned.

Publication Information

Output type

Scholary Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Original language

English (US)

Pages from-to (Number of pages)

Pages 261-265 (5 pages)

Journal (Volume, Issue Number)

Prostate Cancer and Prostatic Diseases (Volume 6, Issue 3)

Publication milestones

  • Published - 2003

Publication status

Published - 2003

ISSN

1365-7852

Publication IDs

  • Scopus: 0141725673
  • PubMed: 12970733

Publication metrics

Metrics

SciVal
citations
6
SciVal
FWCI
0.20
SciVal
Author count
7
SciVal
Paper percentile
50
Scopus
citations
Fractional count
1
Fractional count
0.14
Fractional count
6
Fractional count
0.86
Fractional count
1
Fractional count
1

PlumX, opens in new tab

Captures
10
Citation count
6

Funding Details

This work was supported by the Department of Veterans Affairs and a Center for Prostate Disease Research (CPDR) grant from the United States Army Medical Research and Material Command.