It's about quality, not quantity: Qualitative FDG PET/CT criteria for therapy response assessment in clinical practice
- Kevin P. Banks(corresponding author),
- Justin G. Peacock,
- Mariya Gusman,
- Michael N. Clemenshaw
- Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences,
- United States Army,
- Washington University St. Louis,
Scholary Output:
Contribution to journal
Review article
Peer-reviewAbstract
Objective FDG PET/CT has emerged as an effective tool for the timely accurate assessment of how tumors respond to therapy. To standardize interpretation and reporting, numerous response criteria have been developed. This article will review the evolution of these criteria along with their strengths and weaknesses. Conclusion: Several qualitative assessments applicable to common malignancies have been developed in recent years that solve many of the challenges faced by their quantitative predecessors. These are reviewed, and information is provided regarding individual treatment efficacy and prognosis.
Publication Information
Output type
Scholary Output:
Contribution to journal
Review article
Peer-reviewOriginal language
English (US)Pages from-to (Number of pages)
Pages 313-324 (12 pages)Journal (Volume, Issue Number)
American Journal of Roentgenology (Volume 215, Issue 2)Publication milestones
- Published - 08/2020
Publication status
Published - 08/2020
ISSN
0361-803XPublication IDs
- Scopus: 85089161298
- PubMed: 32551905
Publication metrics
Metrics
Fractional count
1
Fractional count
0.25
Fractional count
3
Fractional count
0.75
Fractional count
1
Fractional count
1
PlumX, opens in new tab
Citation count
8
Captures
23
