Skip to search boxSkip to navigationSkip to main content

It's about quality, not quantity: Qualitative FDG PET/CT criteria for therapy response assessment in clinical practice

  • Kevin P. Banks(corresponding author)
    ,
  • Justin G. Peacock
    ,
  • Mariya Gusman
    ,
  • Michael N. Clemenshaw
*Corresponding author for this work
Scholary Output:
Contribution to journal
Review article
Peer-review

Abstract

Objective FDG PET/CT has emerged as an effective tool for the timely accurate assessment of how tumors respond to therapy. To standardize interpretation and reporting, numerous response criteria have been developed. This article will review the evolution of these criteria along with their strengths and weaknesses. Conclusion: Several qualitative assessments applicable to common malignancies have been developed in recent years that solve many of the challenges faced by their quantitative predecessors. These are reviewed, and information is provided regarding individual treatment efficacy and prognosis.

Publication Information

Output type

Scholary Output:
Contribution to journal
Review article
Peer-review

Original language

English (US)

Pages from-to (Number of pages)

Pages 313-324 (12 pages)

Journal (Volume, Issue Number)

American Journal of Roentgenology (Volume 215, Issue 2)

Publication milestones

  • Published - 08/2020

Publication status

Published - 08/2020

ISSN

0361-803X

Publication IDs

  • Scopus: 85089161298
  • PubMed: 32551905

Publication metrics

Metrics

Fractional count
1
Fractional count
0.25
Fractional count
3
Fractional count
0.75
Fractional count
1
Fractional count
1
Scopus
citations

PlumX, opens in new tab

Citation count
8
Captures
23