Skip to search boxSkip to navigationSkip to main content

Lead revision surgery for vagus nerve stimulation in epilepsy: Outcomes and efficacy

  • Hena Waseem
    ,
  • Scott J. Raffa
    ,
  • Selim R. Benbadis
    ,
  • Fernando L. Vale(corresponding author)
*Corresponding author for this work
  • University of South Florida
Scholary Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Abstract

We present, to our knowledge, the first published analysis of vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) lead revisions to incorporate quality of life, clinical response, and antiepileptic drug (AED) burden in postrevision clinical outcomes. Ten patients were followed and had no postoperative complications. Seven patients had improvement in quality of life, and three experienced no change. Eight patients noted a restoration of clinical response comparable with initial VNS implantation. Seven patients reported 30-60% improvement in seizure reduction, two experienced >. 60%, and one noted <. 30%. Six patients had no change in AED burden. Vagus nerve stimulation lead revision should be considered a safe option for patients with VNS lead failure and medically intractable epilepsy.

Publication Information

Output type

Scholary Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Original language

English (US)

Pages from-to (Number of pages)

Pages 110-113 (4 pages)

Journal (Volume, Issue Number)

Epilepsy and Behavior (Volume 31)

Publication milestones

  • Published - 02/01/2014

Publication status

Published - 02/01/2014

ISSN

1525-5050

Publication IDs

  • Scopus: 84891651557
  • PubMed: 24389021

Publication metrics

Metrics

Fractional count
1
Fractional count
0.25
Fractional count
3
Fractional count
0.75
Fractional count
1
Fractional count
1
SciVal
FWCI
0.99
SciVal
Author count
4
SciVal
citations
13
SciVal
Paper percentile
73
Scopus
citations

PlumX, opens in new tab

Citation count
18
Captures
50