Skip to search boxSkip to navigationSkip to main content

Letter to the Editor: On "Advantages and disadvantages of stiffness instructions when studying postural control" by C.T. Bonnet: You just can't win: Advantages and disadvantages of the postural stability requirement

  • Y. Lajoie(corresponding author)
    ,
  • N. Richer
    ,
  • ,
  • N. Polskaia
    ,
  • D. Saunders
*Corresponding author for this work
  • University of Ottawa
Scholary Output:
Contribution to journal
Comment/debate
Peer-review

Abstract

In the examination of postural control, instructions to stand as still as possible are common and promote a relatively unnatural sway pattern. The validity of the stability requirement is discussed in the present commentary in response to the discussion initiated by Cedrick T. Bonnet. The advantages of using the stability requirement include: evaluating unbiased postural control, reducing variability in postural sway, manipulating focus of attention, examining the ability to maintain an upright stance, and ecological validity of testing. The disadvantages include: constraining natural postural sway, increasing the complexity of the control condition, promoting an internal focus of attention, and reducing the ability to detect exploratory behaviour. After evaluating the aforementioned advantages and disadvantages, the present commentary suggests that researchers should strive to provide specific instructions to maintain feet, arm and eye position without specifically requiring participants to reduce their postural sway.

Publication Information

Output type

Scholary Output:
Contribution to journal
Comment/debate
Peer-review

Original language

English (US)

Pages from-to (Number of pages)

Pages 215-218 (4 pages)

Journal (Volume, Issue Number)

Gait and Posture (Volume 46)

Publication milestones

  • Published - 05/01/2016

Publication status

Published - 05/01/2016

ISSN

0966-6362

Publication IDs

  • Scopus: 84966393482
  • PubMed: 27131209

Publication metrics

Metrics

Scopus
citations
Fractional count
1
Fractional count
0.20
Fractional count
4
Fractional count
0.80
Fractional count
1
Fractional count
1

PlumX, opens in new tab

Captures
17
Citation count
5