Skip to search boxSkip to navigationSkip to main content

Local-pooled-error test for identifying differentially expressed genes with a small number of replicated microarrays

  • Nitin Jain
    ,
  • Jayant Thatte
    ,
  • Thomas Braciale
    ,
  • ,
  • Michael O'Connell
    ,
  • Jae K. Lee(corresponding author)
*Corresponding author for this work
Scholary Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Open access

Abstract

Motivation: In microarray studies gene discovery based on fold-change values is often misleading because error variability for each gene is heterogeneous under different biological conditions and intensity ranges. Several statistical testing methods for differential gene expression have been suggested, but some of these approaches are underpowered and result in high false positive rates because within-gene variance estimates are based on a small number of replicated arrays. Results: We propose to use local-pooled-error (LPE) estimates and robust statistical tests for evaluating significance of each gene's differential expression. Our LPE estimation is based on pooling errors within genes and between replicate arrays for genes in which expression values are similar. We have applied our LPE method to compare gene expression in naïve and activated CD8+ T-cells. Our results show that the LPE method effectively identifies significant differential-expression patterns with a small number of replicated arrays.

Publication Information

Output type

Scholary Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Original language

English (US)

Pages from-to (Number of pages)

Pages 1945-1951 (7 pages)

Journal (Volume, Issue Number)

Bioinformatics (Volume 19, Issue 15)

Publication milestones

  • Published - 10/12/2003

Publication status

Published - 10/12/2003

ISSN

1367-4803

Publication IDs

  • Scopus: 0142179210
  • PubMed: 14555628

Publication metrics

Metrics

Scopus
citations
Fractional count
1
Fractional count
0.17
Fractional count
5
Fractional count
0.83
Fractional count
1
Fractional count
1

PlumX, opens in new tab

Citation count
272
Mentions
1
Captures
139

Funding Details

We greatly thank for the reviewers’ and the associate editor’s comments, which helped us to improve our manuscript significantly. This study was partially supported by the American Cancer Society grant RSG-02-182-01-MGO.