Skip to search boxSkip to navigationSkip to main content

Long-term outcomes of laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding

  • Jad Khoraki
    ,
  • Marilia G. Moraes
    ,
  • Adriana P.F. Neto
    ,
  • Luke M. Funk
    ,
  • Jacob A. Greenberg
    ,
  • Guilherme M. Campos(corresponding author)
*Corresponding author for this work
  • University of Wisconsin-Madison
    ,
  • Virginia Commonwealth University
    ,
  • Department of Veterans Affairs
Scholary Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Sustainable Development Goals

  • SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well

Abstract

Background Laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB) is an option for the treatment of severe obesity. Few US studies have reported long-term outcomes. We aimed to present long-term outcomes with LAGB. Methods Retrospective study of patients who underwent LAGB at an academic medical center in the US from 1/2005 to 2/2012. Outcomes included weight loss, complications, re-operations, and LAGB failure. Results 208 patients underwent LAGB. Mean BMI was 45.4 ± 6.4 kg/m2. Mean follow-up was 5.6 (0.5–10.7) years. Complete follow-up was available for 90% at one year (186/207), 80% at five years (136/171), and 71% at ten years (10/14). Percentage of excess weight loss at one, five, and ten years was 29.9, 30, and 16.9, respectively. Forty-eight patients (23.1%) required a reoperation. LAGB failure occurred in 118 (57%) and higher baseline BMI was the only independently associated factor (OR 1.1; 95%CI 1.0–1.1; p = 0.016). Conclusion LAGB was associated with poor short and long-term weight loss outcomes and a high failure rate. With the increased safety profile and greater efficacy of other surgical techniques, LAGB utilization should be discouraged.

Publication Information

Output type

Scholary Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Original language

English (US)

Pages from-to (Number of pages)

Pages 97-103 (7 pages)

Journal (Volume, Issue Number)

American Journal of Surgery (Volume 215, Issue 1)

Publication milestones

  • Published - 01/2018

Publication status

Published - 01/2018

ISSN

0002-9610

Publication IDs

  • Scopus: 85021998435
  • PubMed: 28693840

Publication metrics

Metrics

Fractional count
1
Fractional count
0.17
Fractional count
5
Fractional count
0.83
Fractional count
1
Fractional count
1
Scopus
citations

PlumX, opens in new tab

Citation count
18
Captures
81