Skip to search boxSkip to navigationSkip to main content

Long-term results of the Lothrop operation

*Corresponding author for this work
  • University of Virginia
Scholary Output:
Contribution to journal
Review article
Peer-review

Abstract

With continued surgical instrument advancement, endoscopic sinus surgery techniques continue to evolve with an overall improvement of our ability to offer surgical treatment for a variety of surgical disorders of the sinuses and anterior skull base. Frontal sinusitis and the extent of surgery performed in the frontal recess once medical management fails are constantly debated in the literature. It seems that even though instrumentation has greatly improved, surgical management of frontal sinusitis remains a frustrating endeavor for otolaryngologists. Open approaches to the frontal sinus, including the osteoplastic flap with frontal sinus obliteration using adipose tissue, have been the gold standard, but require external incisions and complete removal of sinus mucosa with destruction of the frontal sinus. The endoscopic modified Lothrop technique involves removal of the frontal sinus floor bilaterally with frontal septectomy and resection of the nasal septum to create a large nasofrontal communication. Recent postoperative results of this technique rival the results after frontal sinus obliteration in selected patients while avoiding the morbidity associated with the open destructive approach.

Publication Information

Output type

Scholary Output:
Contribution to journal
Review article
Peer-review

Original language

English (US)

Pages from-to (Number of pages)

Pages 37-40 (4 pages)

Journal (Volume, Issue Number)

Current Opinion in Otolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery (Volume 11, Issue 1)

Publication milestones

  • Published - 02/2003

Publication status

Published - 02/2003

ISSN

1068-9508

Publication IDs

  • Scopus: 0037304050
  • PubMed: 14515100

Publication metrics

Metrics

SciVal
FWCI
1.67
SciVal
Author count
2
SciVal
citations
19
SciVal
Paper percentile
69
Scopus
citations
Fractional count
1
Fractional count
0.50
Fractional count
1
Fractional count
0.50
Fractional count
1
Fractional count
1

PlumX, opens in new tab

Citation count
25
Captures
10