Skip to search boxSkip to navigationSkip to main content

Long-term retrospective study of the clinical performance of fiber posts

  • Marco Ferrari(corresponding author)
    ,
  • Maria Crysanti Cagidiaco
    ,
  • Cecilia Goracci
    ,
  • Alessandro Vichi
    ,
  • Pier Nicola Mason
    ,
  • Ivana Radovic
*Corresponding author for this work
  • University of Siena
    ,
  • Tufts University
    ,
  • University of Padua
    ,
  • University of Belgrade
    ,
Scholary Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Abstract

Purpose: To retrospectively evaluate the long-term clinical performance of three types of fiber posts after a service period of 7-11 years. Methods: 985 posts were included in the study: 615 Composiposts, 160 ÆEstethic Posts and 210 ÆEsthetic Plus Posts were placed into endodontically treated teeth. Four combinations of dentin adhesives/luting materials were used. Endodontic and prosthodontic results were recorded. Results: A 7-11% failure rate was recorded for the three types of posts. A total of 79 failures were recorded: 39 due to endodontic reasons, one root fracture, one fiber post fracture, 17 crown dislodgements and 21 due to post debonding. The mechanical failures were always related to the lack of coronal tooth structure. The results indicated that fiber posts in combination with bonding/luting materials may be used routinely for restoring endodontically treated teeth. Mechanical failure of restored teeth with fiber posts can be related to the amount of residual coronal structure.

Publication Information

Output type

Scholary Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Original language

English (US)

Pages from-to (Number of pages)

Pages 287-291 (5 pages)

Journal (Volume, Issue Number)

American journal of dentistry (Volume 20, Issue 5)

Publication milestones

  • Published - 10/2007

Publication status

Published - 10/2007

ISSN

0894-8275

Publication IDs

  • Scopus: 34547959521
  • PubMed: 17993023

Publication metrics

Metrics

Fractional count
1
Fractional count
0.14
Fractional count
6
Fractional count
0.86
Fractional count
1
Fractional count
1
Scopus
citations
SciVal
FWCI
6.09
SciVal
Author count
7
SciVal
citations
168
SciVal
Paper percentile
98
SciVal
Top percentile
5

PlumX

Citation count
224
Captures
240