Skip to search boxSkip to navigationSkip to main content

Male pigeons react differentially to altered facial features of female pigeons

  • ,
  • Gabrielle Szafranski
    ,
  • Toru Shimizu(corresponding author)
*Corresponding author for this work
  • University of South Florida
Scholary Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Open access

Abstract

Male pigeons exhibit robust courtship to the head of a female, but not so much to the body. The specific features in the female head which are critical for triggering courtship from males remain unclear. We examined this issue by studying preference behaviour of male pigeons between a pair of photographic images of female conspecifics: a series of normal female faces and a series of digitally altered facial features. Preference was determined by measuring the duration of male courtship 'coo' responses near each of these images. Males preferred intact females compared to those missing the eyes and beak. They also responded less when only the eyes and beak were visible without the head, suggesting that these local features were important, yet more effective when embedded in the context of the head than when they were not. Enlarging or removing the beak had a significant impact on preference, whereas manipulating the eyes had a weaker effect. Finally, males exhibited no preference between normal females and those that had spatially rearranged eyes and beak. These results suggest that pigeons naturally attend to the local features of the head, but not to the spatial configuration, for conspecific recognition.

Publication Information

Output type

Scholary Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Original language

English (US)

Pages from-to (Number of pages)

Pages 757-773 (17 pages)

Journal (Volume, Issue Number)

Behaviour (Volume 147, Issue 5-6)

Publication milestones

  • Published - 04/01/2010

Publication status

Published - 04/01/2010

ISSN

0005-7959

Publication IDs

  • Scopus: 77952645145

Publication metrics

Metrics

Scopus
citations
Fractional count
1
Fractional count
0.33
Fractional count
2
Fractional count
0.67
Fractional count
1
Fractional count
1
SciVal
FWCI
0.17
SciVal
Author count
3
SciVal
citations
10
SciVal
Paper percentile
63

PlumX, opens in new tab

Citation count
18
Usage
114
Captures
31

Funding Details

The authors thank the following students for helping collecting and managing the data and analyzing videotapes: Sophia Jones, Jennifer Miller, Christin McKay and Naomi Watanabe. The authors also thank Justine VandenBosche, Peter N. Otovic, and anonymous reviewers for their thoughtful and constructive guidance in the writing of earlier versions of this manuscript. This research was supported by an Established Researcher Grant from the University of South Florida and a research grant from the National Science Foundation to T.S. (IBN-0091869). All methods used in these experiments comply with the IACUC of the University of South Florida.