Skip to search boxSkip to navigationSkip to main content

Measuring direct and indirect aggression: Is there a response bias?

*Corresponding author for this work
Scholary Output:
Contribution to journal
Review article
Peer-review

Abstract

Critics of self-report methods suggest that participants are likely to underreport their own negative behaviors given concerns about social desirability. The current study examined the problem of self-report bias by comparing individuals' estimates of their own and others' aggressive behavior. Undergraduate students (95 women, 50 men) completed the Richardson Conflict Response Questionnaire with regard to either their own behavior or that of another person of the same sex. As expected, participants reported significantly less aggression for themselves than for others. However, self and other ratings showed the same pattern of sex differences. These results suggest that, although individuals may underreport their own aggressive behaviors, this tendency may not affect relationships among variables.

Publication Information

Output type

Scholary Output:
Contribution to journal
Review article
Peer-review

Original language

English (US)

Pages from-to (Number of pages)

Pages 563-566 (4 pages)

Journal (Volume, Issue Number)

Psychological reports (Volume 97, Issue 2)

Publication milestones

  • Published - 10/2005

Publication status

Published - 10/2005

ISSN

0033-2941

Publication IDs

  • Scopus: 29544445289
  • PubMed: 16342585

Publication metrics

Metrics

SciVal
citations
6
Scopus
citations
Fractional count
1
Fractional count
0.33
Fractional count
2
Fractional count
0.67
Fractional count
1
Fractional count
1
SciVal
Author count
3
SciVal
Paper percentile
53

PlumX, opens in new tab

Captures
11
Citation count
12