Skip to search boxSkip to navigationSkip to main content

Meta-analysis of Calibration, Discrimination, and Stratum-Specific Likelihood Ratios for the CRB-65 Score

  • Mark H. Ebell(corresponding author)
    ,
  • Mary E. Walsh
    ,
  • Tom Fahey
    ,
  • Maggie Kearney
    ,
  • Christian Marchello
*Corresponding author for this work
  • ,
  • Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland
    ,
  • University of Georgia
Scholary Output:
Contribution to journal
Review article
Peer-review

Open access

Abstract

Background: The CRB-65 score is recommended as a decision support tool to help identify patients with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) who can safely be treated as outpatients. Objective: To perform an updated meta-analysis of the accuracy, discrimination, and calibration of the CRB-65 score using a novel approach to calculation of stratum-specific likelihood ratios. Design: Meta-analysis of accuracy, discrimination, and calibration. Methods: We searched PubMed, Google, previous systematic reviews, and reference lists of included studies. Data was abstracted and quality assessed in parallel by two investigators. The quality assessment used an adaptation of the TRIPOD and PROBAST criteria. Measures of discrimination, calibration, and stratum-specific likelihood ratios are reported. Key Results: Twenty-nine studies met our inclusion criteria and provided usable data. Most studies were set in Europe, none in North America, and 12 were judged to be at low risk of bias. The pooled estimate of area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.74 (95% CI 0.71–0.77) for all studies. Calibration was good although there was significant heterogeneity; the pooled estimate of the ratio of observed to expected mortality for all studies was 1.04 (95% CI 0.91–1.19). The corresponding values for studies at low risk of bias where patients could be treated as outpatients or inpatients were 0.76 (0.70–0.81) and 0.88 (0.69–1.13). Summary estimates of stratum-specific likelihood ratios for all studies were 0.19 for the low-risk group, 1.1 for the moderate-risk group, and 4.5 for the high-risk group, and 0.13, 1.3, and 5.6 for studies at low risk of bias where patients could be treated as outpatients or inpatients. Conclusions: The CRB-65 is useful for identifying low-risk patients for outpatient therapy. Given a 4% overall mortality risk, patients classified as low risk by the CRB-65 had an outpatient mortality risk of no more than 0.5%.

Publication Information

Output type

Scholary Output:
Contribution to journal
Review article
Peer-review

Original language

English (US)

Pages from-to (Number of pages)

Pages 1304-1313 (10 pages)

Journal (Volume, Issue Number)

Journal of General Internal Medicine (Volume 34, Issue 7)

Publication milestones

  • Published - 07/15/2019

Publication status

Published - 07/15/2019

ISSN

0884-8734

Publication IDs

  • Scopus: 85064703064
  • PubMed: 30993633

Publication metrics

Metrics

SciVal
citations
6
Scopus
citations
SciVal
FWCI
0.72
SciVal
Author count
5
SciVal
Paper percentile
80
Fractional count
1
Fractional count
0.20
Fractional count
4
Fractional count
0.80
Fractional count
1
Fractional count
1

PlumX, opens in new tab

Captures
26
Citation count
16

Funding Details

Dr. Ebell’s collaboration with Drs. Fahey and Walsh was supported by a 2018/2019 Fulbright Teaching/Research award.
FunderFunding numbers
2018/2019 Fulbright
-