Skip to search boxSkip to navigationSkip to main content

Methods used by critical care nurses to verify feeding tube placement in clinical practice

  • Annette Bourgault(corresponding author)
    ,
  • Janie Heath
    ,
  • Vallire Hooper
    ,
  • Mary Lou Sole
    ,
*Corresponding author for this work
Scholary Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Open access

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The American Association of Critical-Care Nurses practice alert on verification of feeding tube placement makes evidence-based practice recommendations to guide nursing management of adult patients with blindly inserted feeding tubes. Many bedside verification methods do not allow detection of improper positioning of a feeding tube within the gastrointestinal tract, thereby increasing aspiration risk. OBJECTIVES: To determine how the expected practices from the American Association of Critical-Care Nurses practice alert were implemented by critical care nurses. METHODS: This study was part of a larger national, online survey that was completed by 370 critical care nurses. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze the data. RESULTS: Seventy-eight percent of nurses used a variety of methods to verify initial placement of feeding tubes, although 14% were unaware that tube position should be confirmed every 4 hours. Despite the inaccuracy of auscultation methods, only 12% of nurses avoided this practice all of the time. CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of expected clinical practices from this guideline varied. Nurses are encouraged to implement expected practices from this evidence-based, peer reviewed practice alert to minimize risk for patient harm.

Publication Information

Output type

Scholary Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Original language

English (US)

Pages from-to (Number of pages)

Pages e1-e7

Journal (Volume, Issue Number)

Critical care nurse (Volume 35, Issue 1)

Publication milestones

  • Published - 2015

Publication status

Published - 2015

ISSN

0279-5442

Publication IDs

  • Scopus: 84930323596
  • PubMed: 25639583

Publication metrics

Metrics

Fractional count
2
Fractional count
0.40
Fractional count
3
Fractional count
0.60
Fractional count
2
Fractional count
1
Scopus
citations
SciVal
FWCI
1.38
SciVal
Author count
5
SciVal
citations
12
SciVal
Paper percentile
72

PlumX, opens in new tab

Captures
56
Citation count
23
Usage
3