Skip to search boxSkip to navigationSkip to main content

Misdiagnosis of cervical ectopic pregnancy

  • Valerie I. Shavell(corresponding author)
    ,
  • Mazen E. Abdallah
    ,
  • Mark A. Zakaria
    ,
  • Jay M. Berman
    ,
  • ,
  • Elizabeth E. Puscheck
*Corresponding author for this work
  • Wayne State University
Scholary Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Abstract

Purpose To determine the presenting symptoms as well as the frequency and reasons for the delayed diagnosis of cervical ectopic pregnancy (CEP) in order to increase detection and prevent treatment delay. Methods Retrospective case series of 15 women treated for CEP from January 1997 through December 2008 at a university teaching hospital. Results Fifteen patients were treated for CEP during the study period. Eight patients presented to the emergency department, of which 6 (75%) were initially misdiagnosed. The most common misdiagnosis was threatened miscarriage (n = 5). All patients with accurately diagnosed CEP presented with heavy vaginal bleeding; those misdiagnosed reported mild to moderate vaginal bleeding. Three of six patients misdiagnosed did not have an ultrasound performed upon presentation, and three patients had an ultrasound report not suggestive of CEP. CEP was diagnosed on follow-up ultrasound, delaying treatment 1-4 days. Conclusions Misdiagnosis of CEP upon initial presentation is a common occurrence. Transvaginal ultrasound performed by a qualified practitioner may increase detection and prevent treatment delay.

Publication Information

Output type

Scholary Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Original language

English (US)

Pages from-to (Number of pages)

Pages 423-426 (4 pages)

Journal (Volume, Issue Number)

Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics (Volume 285, Issue 2)

Publication milestones

  • Published - 02/2012

Publication status

Published - 02/2012

ISSN

0932-0067

Publication IDs

  • Scopus: 84864484428
  • PubMed: 21748311
  • ORCID: /0000-0001-6353-4489/work/227033236

Publication metrics

Metrics

Scopus
citations
SciVal
citations
12
SciVal
FWCI
0.60
SciVal
Author count
6
SciVal
Paper percentile
69
Fractional count
1
Fractional count
0.17
Fractional count
5
Fractional count
0.83
Fractional count
1
Fractional count
1

PlumX, opens in new tab

Citation count
17
Captures
35