Skip to search boxSkip to navigationSkip to main content

Mixed Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex infections and false-negative results for rifampin resistance by genexpert MTB/RIF are associated with poor clinical outcomes

  • Nicola M. Zetola(corresponding author)
    ,
  • Sanghyuk S. Shin
    ,
  • Kefentse A. Tumedi
    ,
  • Keletso Moeti
    ,
  • Ronald Ncube
    ,
  • Mark Nicol
*Corresponding author for this work
  • University of Pennsylvania
    ,
  • University of Botswana
    ,
  • Botswana-UPenn Partnership
    ,
  • University of California at Los Angeles
    ,
  • National Health Laboratories
    ,
  • Botswana Ministry of Health & Wellness
Scholary Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Open access

Sustainable Development Goals

  • SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well

Abstract

The Xpert MTB/RIF (Xpert) assay is becoming a principal screening tool for diagnosing rifampin-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex (MTBC) infection. However, little is known about the performance of the Xpert assay in infections with both drug-sensitive and drug-resistant strains (mixed MTBC infections). We assessed the performance of the Xpert assay for detecting rifampin resistance using phenotypic drug sensitivity testing (DST) as the reference standard in 370 patients with microbiologically proven pulmonary tuberculosis. Mixed MTBC infections were identified genetically through 24-locus mycobacterial interspersed repetitive-unit-variable-number tandem-repeat (MIRU-VNTR) analysis. Logistic regression was used to identify the factors associated with poor (defined as treatment failure, default, and death from any cause) or good (defined as cure or successful treatment completion) clinical outcomes. The analytic sensitivity of the Xpert assay for detecting rifampin resistance was assessed in vitro by testing cultures containing different ratios of drug-sensitive and drug-resistant organisms. Rifampin resistance was detected by the Xpert assay in 52 (14.1%) and by phenotypic DST in 55 (14.9%) patients. Mixed MTBC infections were identified in 37 (10.0%) patients. The Xpert assay was 92.7% (95% confidence interval [CI], 82.4% to 97.9%) sensitive for detecting rifampin resistance and 99.7% (95% CI, 98.3% to 99.9%) specific. When restricted to patients with mixed MTBC infections, Xpert sensitivity was 80.0% (95% CI, 56.3 to 94.3%). False-negative Xpert results (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 6.6; 95% CI,1.2 to 48.2) and mixed MTBC infections (aOR, 6.5; 95% CI, 2.1 to 20.5) were strongly associated with poor clinical outcome. The Xpert assay failed to detect rifampin resistance in vitro when<90% of the organisms in the sample were rifampin resistant. Our study indicates that the Xpert assay has an increased false-negative rate for detecting rifampin resistance with mixed MTBC infections. In hyperendemic settings where mixed infections are common, the Xpert results might need further confirmation.

Publication Information

Output type

Scholary Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Original language

English (US)

Pages from-to (Number of pages)

Pages 2422-2429 (8 pages)

Journal (Volume, Issue Number)

Journal of clinical microbiology (Volume 52, Issue 7)

Publication milestones

  • Published - 07/2014

Publication status

Published - 07/2014

ISSN

0095-1137

Publication IDs

  • Scopus: 84903764046
  • PubMed: 24789181

Publication metrics

Metrics

Fractional count
1
Fractional count
0.11
Fractional count
8
Fractional count
0.89
Fractional count
1
Fractional count
1
Scopus
citations

PlumX, opens in new tab

Mentions
3
Social media
12
Captures
202
Citation count
130

Funding Details

FundersFunding numbers
National Institutes of Health
T32MH080634, R01AI097045, P30AI45008
NIAID
R21AI105611