Skip to search boxSkip to navigationSkip to main content

Morphometric assessment of dissection fields with robotic thyroidectomy approaches: Pre-clinical investigation

  • Michael C. Singer(corresponding author)
    ,
  • Melanie W. Seybt
    ,
*Corresponding author for this work
  • Department of Otolaryngology/Head and Neck Surgery
Scholary Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Sustainable Development Goals

  • SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well

Abstract

Objectives: Robotic thyroidectomy was introduced in the United States despite scant pre-clinical data. We sought to define differences in the extent of dissection associated with 2 different robotic thyroidectomy techniques using morphometric measurements of the area of dissection required for each approach. Design: Morphometric analysis of human cadavers. Methods: Seven fresh human cadavers were obtained for surface anatomical study. Using previously defined landmarks, the area necessary to accomplish robotic thyroidectomy using either the transaxillary or facelift approach was marked in a standardized fashion for these procedures and then photographed. ImageJ software (National Institute of Health) was used to calibrate the photographs and measure the surface area of the region requiring dissection in each approach. Results: A total of 28 robotic thyroidectomy dissection pockets were simulated (14 for each of the 2 surgical approaches) with each specimen serving as its own control. The mean area of dissection required for RFT was 39.2 ± 6.6 cm2 (range 25.2 to 47.9 cm2). For RAT, the area was 38.3% greater on average (p<0.0001): the mean was 63.5 ± 9.6 cm2 (range 52.3 to 83.6 cm2). Conclusions: There are few objective data governing the recent adoption of technology-intense robotic thyroidectomy procedures. We have quantified the difference in dissection required when accomplishing two different robotic approaches. These measurable differences may help to define advantages when comparing available surgical techniques.

Publication Information

Output type

Scholary Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Original language

English (US)

Pages from-to (Number of pages)

Pages S294

Journal (Volume, Issue Number)

Laryngoscope (Volume 121, Issue SUPPL. 5)

Publication milestones

  • Published - 2011

Publication status

Published - 2011

ISSN

0023-852X

Publication IDs

  • Scopus: 80052008583

Publication metrics

Metrics

Fractional count
1
Fractional count
0.33
Fractional count
2
Fractional count
0.67
Fractional count
1
Fractional count
1
SciVal
Author count
3
SciVal
Paper percentile
24