Skip to search boxSkip to navigationSkip to main content

Mortality after esophagectomy: Risk factor analysis

  • Mark K. Ferguson(corresponding author)
    ,
  • Terri R. Martin
    ,
  • Laurie B. Reeder
    ,
  • Jemi Olak
*Corresponding author for this work
  • The University of Chicago
Scholary Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Abstract

Esophageal resection is associated with a high incidence of operative mortality, suggesting the need for predictors of operative risk. A retrospective analysis was performed for esophagectomy patients using univariate and multivariate analyses; relative risks (RR) were calculated. Of the 269 patients, 35 (13%) died. The optimal model for the preoperative prediction of risk of mortality was defined by age (p = 0.001; RR = 2.6) and performance status (p = 0.04; RR = 1.9). Delimiting the data pool using a calculated risk of 0.2 accurately identified outcomes in 79% of patients and predicted 41% of deaths. The optimal model for the overall prediction of risk of mortality was defined by age (p = 0.001; RR = 3.9), intraoperative blood loss (p < 0.001; RR = 1.7), pulmonary complications (p = 0.002; RR = 6.6), and the need for inotropic support (p = 0.003; RR = 10.2). The individual risk of mortality after esophagectomy can be predicted preoperatively with a model based on patient age and performance status. The findings underscore the importance of preoperative evaluation of cardiopulmonary function, meticulous operative technique, and aggressive respiratory care in the management of the esophagectomy patient.

Publication Information

Output type

Scholary Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Original language

English (US)

Pages from-to (Number of pages)

Pages 599-604 (6 pages)

Journal (Volume, Issue Number)

World Journal of Surgery (Volume 21, Issue 6)

Publication milestones

  • Published - 07/1997

Publication status

Published - 07/1997

ISSN

0364-2313

Publication IDs

  • Scopus: 0030909266
  • PubMed: 9230656

Publication metrics

Metrics

Scopus
citations
SciVal
citations
143
Fractional count
1
Fractional count
0.25
Fractional count
3
Fractional count
0.75
Fractional count
1
Fractional count
1
SciVal
FWCI
2.47
SciVal
Author count
4
SciVal
Paper percentile
96
SciVal
Top percentile
5

PlumX, opens in new tab

Citation count
152
Captures
28